[raydan]

I find that the beautiful girls aren't very good in bed. My guess is that the others just try hardy.

[Brenda]

eureka eureka:

It is no hard and fast rule, but "beautiful" people would, have, as a class, somewhat superior intelligence and skills.

THAT's why all the "smart" ones participate in "beauty" pageants! It's actually an IQ-test!

[eureka]

Brenda Brenda:

eureka eureka:

It is no hard and fast rule, but "beautiful" people would, have, as a class, somewhat superior intelligence and skills.

THAT's why all the "smart" ones participate in "beauty" pageants! It's actually an IQ-test!

Even they, Brenda, are almost certainly above average IQ.

[Brenda]

eureka eureka:

Brenda Brenda:

eureka eureka:

It is no hard and fast rule, but "beautiful" people would, have, as a class, somewhat superior intelligence and skills.

THAT's why all the "smart" ones participate in "beauty" pageants! It's actually an IQ-test!

Even they, Brenda, are almost certainly above average IQ.

When you set the average at 70, sure.
I am not necessarily talking about the Miss Universe ladies, but more about the ones on the road there, you do understand that, right?
You don't just wake up one day, and become a candidate there.

[raydan]

First of all, beauty is in the eye is the beholder... that is, one man's junk is another man's treasure. If the study said that better groomed people earn more and are happier, I'd agree, but the obvious question would be, "Are groomed people happier, or do happy people pay more attention to grooming?".

As to the link between beauty and intelligence, first of all, there are many ways to measure intelligence and an IQ test is only one of them, some types of intelligence are not mesured. My other argument about beauty still holds.

These 2 are considered intelligent and beautiful. While I won't discuss their intelligence, I do not consider them beautiful.

[saturn_656]

eureka eureka:

Brenda Brenda:

eureka eureka:

It is no hard and fast rule, but "beautiful" people would, have, as a class, somewhat superior intelligence and skills.

THAT's why all the "smart" ones participate in "beauty" pageants! It's actually an IQ-test!

Even they, Brenda, are almost certainly above average IQ.

Sure they are.

[Canadian_Mind]

raydan, I wouldn't touch that chick with a 20 foot pole.

As for the guy, I find it hard as a guy to figure out what would be considered handsome, and what isn't. On a girl it's easy for me to say yes, maybe, or no. On guys I've just never cared.

[ShepherdsDog]

eureka eureka:

Brenda Brenda:

eureka eureka:

It is no hard and fast rule, but "beautiful" people would, have, as a class, somewhat superior intelligence and skills.

THAT's why all the "smart" ones participate in "beauty" pageants! It's actually an IQ-test!

Even they, Brenda, are almost certainly above average IQ.

Only if you use yourself as the median...to the rest of us, they're pretty stupid.

[Brenda]

raydan raydan:

First of all, beauty is in the eye is the beholder... that is, one man's junk is another man's treasure. If the study said that better groomed people earn more and are happier, I'd agree, but the obvious question would be, "Are groomed people happier, or do happy people pay more attention to grooming?".

As to the link between beauty and intelligence, first of all, there are many ways to measure intelligence and an IQ test is only one of them, some types of intelligence are not mesured. My other argument about beauty still holds.

These 2 are considered intelligent and beautiful. While I won't discuss their intelligence, I do not consider them beautiful.

Me neither.

[raydan]

Thanks for giving your opinion on that, Brenda.

Canadian_Mind is being difficult, trying to make me believe he doesn't have an opinion on whether he finds a dude beautiful or not, as is that would make him gay... or something.

[Zipperfish]

raydan raydan:

Thanks for giving your opinion on that, Brenda.

Canadian_Mind is being difficult, trying to make me believe he doesn't have an opinion on whether he finds a dude beautiful or not, as is that would make him gay... or something.

I'm gay for Johnny Depp. There. I said it.

[ShepherdsDog]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

raydan raydan:

Thanks for giving your opinion on that, Brenda.

Canadian_Mind is being difficult, trying to make me believe he doesn't have an opinion on whether he finds a dude beautiful or not, as is that would make him gay... or something.

I'm gay for Johnny Depp. There. I said it.

You'd likely be gay for Mackenzie-King

[eureka]

There is no link between beauty and intelligence but there is a definite link between physical superiority and intelligence. That is why the fuss about this is surprising since that link has been known for ever.

Athletes also tend to higher intelligence than the general run for the same reasons. I first read of studies of that a generation or more ago.

[raydan]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

raydan raydan:

Thanks for giving your opinion on that, Brenda.

Canadian_Mind is being difficult, trying to make me believe he doesn't have an opinion on whether he finds a dude beautiful or not, as is that would make him gay... or something.

I'm gay for Johnny Depp. There. I said it.

Johnny Depp doesn't count, neither does George Clooney. They're our 2 strikes, finding them attractive doesn't make you gay.

[Gunnair]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

raydan raydan:

Thanks for giving your opinion on that, Brenda.

Canadian_Mind is being difficult, trying to make me believe he doesn't have an opinion on whether he finds a dude beautiful or not, as is that would make him gay... or something.

I'm gay for Johnny Depp. There. I said it.

You don't need qualifiers, buddy! Live the dream!