[EyeBrock]

Xenophobe= Having a different opinion than 'fail' on immigration and diversity.

[Canadiana55]

I see that the practice of Taqiyya (Muslims lying to non-Muslims) is in full force here. You can bet your ass that this is the tip of the iceberg. Britain, Europe and Canada are being run by a group of baffoons who have sold our countries and values up the river. We have allowed a hostile culture to infiltrate and thrive our communities. Just picture what 60 years from now will look like.

[2Cdo]

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Xenophobe= Having a different opinion than 'fail' on immigration and diversity.

That made me laugh!

[BartSimpson]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

sandorski sandorski:

Already has happened here, Residential Schools.

Contemporary example? Residential school system was a product of 19th century worldview.

I'll back Sandorski on this one. That's because madrassahs are a product of a 7th century worldview.

[EyeBrock]

I’m sure these kids will be highly employable in the UK. After all, the top pupils will be able to recite the whole Koran!

Eminently useful and way better than following the curriculum that the rest of the UK school population studies.

[JBG]

CommanderSock CommanderSock:

Most immigrants integrate. Just look at the British and French national soccer teams.

Canadiana55 Canadiana55:

I see that the practice of Taqiyya (Muslims lying to non-Muslims) is in full force here. You can bet your ass that this is the tip of the iceberg. Britain, Europe and Canada are being run by a group of baffoons who have sold our countries and values up the river. We have allowed a hostile culture to infiltrate and thrive our communities. Just picture what 60 years from now will look like.

Those people and most tragically those children are not going to integrate into British life. Ultimately, the mainstream British, and others, will respond violently if the government continues its feckless appeasesemnt of this seditious and destructive conduct.

[canuckns]

EyeBrock EyeBrock:

Xenophobe= Having a different opinion than 'fail' on immigration and diversity.

[BartSimpson]

JBG JBG:

feckless appeasesemnt

No offense to Brock - but feckless appeasement is a recurring British tradition on and off over the past century or so. Meaning that they're all for appeasement until it stops working and they never quite seem to figure out that appeasing bad people, at best, only ever delays the inevitable.

In recent days the Right Honorable Mr. Cameron, Chancellor Merkel, and President Sarkozy have been of one mind in stating that Islam is not at all compatible with European values. Perhaps this may be the opening act of the expulsion of unassimilated Muslims from Europe.

I certainly hope so.

Why? Because I really don't want to see Americans and Canadians having to fight again for real estate that's already been washed in our blood twice over.

[Dayseed]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

No offense to Brock - but feckless appeasement is a recurring British tradition on and off over the past century or so. Meaning that they're all for appeasement until it stops working and they never quite seem to figure out that appeasing bad people, at best, only ever delays the inevitable.

I'll stick up for the Brits here. At least during the 80's, Thatcher didn't appease anybody and bombed a bunch of Argentinians, allowed the Americans to use her bases to bomb a bunch of Libyans, threw the coal miners out and survived an assassination attempt.

Despite all that, she also said "The moment a minority threatens to become a big one, people get frightened. The British character has done so much for democracy, for law, that if there is any fear that it might be swamped, people are going to react and be rather hostile to those coming in"

In her time, it was the Vietnamese. Now it's Arabs, specifically those that practice Islam. Is anybody horrified of the Vietnamese anymore?

[JBG]

Dayseed Dayseed:

In her time, it was the Vietnamese. Now it's Arabs, specifically those that practice Islam. Is anybody horrified of the Vietnamese anymore?

On the other hand are the Vietnamese at war with the West?

[DanSC]

JBG JBG:

Dayseed Dayseed:

In her time, it was the Vietnamese. Now it's Arabs, specifically those that practice Islam. Is anybody horrified of the Vietnamese anymore?

On the other hand are the Vietnamese at war with the West?

No the Vietnamese already won that war.

[ShepherdsDog]

The worst that can happen when the Vietnamese come into your neighbourhood is that family pets disappear.

bartsimpson bartsimpson:

Meaning that they're all for appeasement until it stops working and they never quite seem to figure out that appeasing bad people, at best, only ever delays the inevitable.

Gee, weren't the Americans Johnny come Lately's in both world wars?

[JBG]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Gee, weren't the Americans Johnny come Lately's in both world wars?

Definitely for WW II. Remember for WW I that was originally a European war, and Canada was only dragged in since it had noforeign policy machinery yet. That came, I believe, in waves starting in 1931, 1944 and 1982.

In WW II the U.S.'s position was almost indefensible. As was King's "one Jew is too many" for Canada.

[Mustang1]

JBG JBG:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Gee, weren't the Americans Johnny come Lately's in both world wars?

Definitely for WW II. Remember for WW I that was originally a European war, and Canada was only dragged in since it had noforeign policy machinery yet. That came, I believe, in waves starting in 1931, 1944 and 1982.

In WW II the U.S.'s position was almost indefensible. As was King's "one Jew is too many" for Canada.

Couple of things - one, Canada's entry into the Great War - was indeed politically decided, not militarily. Second, one quote-mined comment compared to American isolationism is not only historically problematic, but it ignores Canadian sacrifices in the process. While King's contemporary (and political) worldview prejudicial, he did still send troops to fight the Nazi scourge well before Americans.

[JBG]

Mustang1 Mustang1:

Second, one quote-mined comment compared to American isolationism is not only historically problematic, but it ignores Canadian sacrifices in the process. While King's contemporary (and political) worldview prejudicial, he did still send troops to fight the Nazi scourge well before Americans.

No question about it. I did refer to the U.S.'s position as "indefensible". Do I need to curse to show I feel strongly about the matter?