Here are the salient questions that uwish didn't answer in his rush to be stupid. I'll highlight them for everybody because I'm merciful.
Me Me:
You know that tasers aren't standard issue, right? In Toronto, I haven't seen one Constable with a taser strapped to their side; just the higher ranks. So, if they're going to bring along a taser TO A CALL OF A VIOLENT MAN GOING APESHIT IN A TERMINAL, they'd better decide who's going to use it.
Ah yes, old uwish certainly wished to avoid having to deal with Dziekanski's violent behaviour. Hard to blame the cops when a violent man is going apeshit.
$1:
I see a man throw his arms up in an aggressive "Don't fucking come near me" gesture. If you see a man surrendering, you're wrong. A violent man who pulls away from the police deserves the taser.
Another good point by me. Here I am setting up uwish. I've categorized his "surrender" as what it really is, an aggressive combative stance towards the police. It dovetails nicely into my future point about the use of force wheel. Don't worry folks, uwish fucked up nicely there too!
$1:
Well, if you're inventing charges that don't exist in the Criminal Code, sure! Why not heap on Electrical Mayhem? Because what you posted is actually called 2nd Degree Murder. Fuck me, are you representative of the public? I hope not.
Uwish is big on not accepting his faults. Look at this point by me. He's so damn ignorant, he accuses the police of murder, but fails to realize that murder is a crime, so he invents a different name for murder. And then botches the whole thing nicely by forgetting the Crown wouldn't go for his Crime of a Thousand Names.
$1:
Hey chump, here's the use of force wheel I found on the RCMP website!
They can use the taser you dipshit! Thanks for embarassing yourself!
And here's where it gets downright ugly for uwish. You'll want to get yourself cozy for this humbling read of uwish!
$1:
perhaps you haven't seen nor read the latest RCMP guidelines for use of impact device, that nice diagram of yours is a bit out of date.
Uwish can't be bothered to prove there's a new use of force wheel. Is there one? Well, the RCMP certainly hasn't troubled themselves to post it if there is. Secondly, even if uwish is correct that there's a new wheel, he forgets a terribly salient point:
THAT'S THE WHEEL THE RCMP WAS USING WHEN THE TASERING OCCURRED!Somehow, we are to dismiss the training the RCMP had at the time and instead impose upon them new standards retroactively. Well, in uwish land this may be accepted practice, but in the real world, it's punitive and flies in the face of established jurisprudence. But why let facts get in the way of uwish's points? He certainly doesn't!
$1:
and the only one who is embarrassing himself on here is you...learn how to spell it first.
And here we have his last tortured bit of self-crapulence. He found one spelling mistake by your's truly, but in his haste to be an idiot, forgets that he routinely forgoes punctuation, grammar and spelling. Yup, nothing like being told you have a crumb on your jacket from somebody wallowing in his own filth and shit.
Take care uwish! I'll be here again and again. Tell Robair too. He needs to hear things repeatedly to help them sink in; he's like an I Am Sam full-retard.
CKA Uber 
