faile faile:
However, I do not want to pay someone's hospital tab when they're injured in high risk activities (mountain climbing, skydiving, motorcycling without a helmet, etc, etc.) nor do I want to take anyone's right to do those things which have little risk of harming anyone else away.
No-fault insurance? You know how much of a boondoggle that was for the auto industry right? We can't make judgement calls like that. Darwin's law will keep that silliness to a minimum. Enforcement of such a practice on a case by case basis simply is an administrative burden and will only further slow care. We need less bureaucracy in this regard not more.
Exactly my point...
Active Member 
