ridenrain ridenrain:
hurley_108 hurley_108:
ridenrain ridenrain:
"Quick Call a snap election"
Like the one we're having now?
John Chretien's government was a strong majority and he had no problem pushing through the senate because Liberals have been stuffing the senate for years.
There was no need for him to call an election because his slightest whim, be that stealing money for his party or using the RCMP to beat up protestors, was done.
The media even blessed his every action with some sort of amusing chuckle.
The Harper government may have been able to get bills passed through the cowardly abstaining Liberals but it's all stuck in the Liberal senate, just like the crime bill.
And an election will alter the senate how? Well, I guess there will be one change, Fortier won't be in it. Or will they just appoint him right back when he loses?
There's no evidence that whatever executive action Harper ordered has not been done. All sorts of programs have been scrapped, civil servants demoted, opposition bills neutered, at his whim.
You think the media will say, "Oh, okay, he won TWO elections. Guess we'd better lighten up, eh, chaps?" Hardly. So what's the point?
Again, how will the senate change as a result of the election? I suppose, on further reflection, Dion could win and fill all the vacancies Harper has refused to, and we'd have an even more Liberal-dominated senate than we do now.
This is a snap election to try to keep the Liberals down in exactly the same way as the 2000 election was a snap election to keep the Alliance down.