RUEZ RUEZ:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
mtbr mtbr:
BTW a Corolla gets a hell of a lot more than 31mpg combined where the fuck did you get that stat from.
From places that do long term testing, and actual fuel usage measurement. The EPA estimates are wayyy off.
Robair Robair:
What exactly are you driving??
mtbr mtbr:
Yeah what the hell are you driving and I think you flunked math

See attachment. Plus an older Crown Vic. My stats are real world, not EPA estimates. I get far better fuel usage than the estimates. Even driving with a heavy foot.
I think the EPA estimates are a little bit closer than this. Otherwise this car is only slightly worse in mpg than my car with a 2.0 liter 4 cylinder.
I find EPA estimates, which are criteria based on cars in the 70's before things like fuel injection, are way off. And as Bart said, a few modifications can greatly impact fuel economy.
mtbr mtbr:
I have driven 869 km in my Corolla the tank was almost empty it took 48 l to fill it. 50l tank
869km/ 48 =18.01km per liter or 5.55l per 100km....which is 50.8748166 miles/gallon imp.
pretty darn close to whats on Toyota Canadas website Fuel Consumption Rating*
City/Highway L /100 km (mpg) 7.1 (40) / 5.3 (53) - Manual
My Crown Vic regularaly pulls 820km from a 69l tank. 8.4l/100km, combined City and Hghway. On long trips, that can extend to 880km, or 7.8l/100km. 3.73 rear gears reallys helps. In 400,000km the car has on it, I've rebuilt the rear LSD, and added the 3.73 gears (3.55 stock) and had the tranny rebuilt. Other than regular maintainence (plugs, wires, fluids etc) - that's all the money I've put in it since I bought it.
The Marauder can improve 1 - 1.5 l/100km just changing the reccommended settings away from the California emisssions settings. Increase rear tire pressure 5psi, for example. It lengthens the rear tire life, and improves fuel economy. Synthetic fluids also increase fuel economy. Change tranny shift points to favour upper RPMs. These minor things have dropped it well below the 9.3l/100km estimated economy, because they overcome the stumbling blocks imposed by the need to comply with California emissions.
Now, back to my point. How is this a 'gas guzzler'? 310 HP stock, corners as well as my 79 Vette', carrys 4 adults and their golf clubs. All 5 passengers have shoulder belts, front, side and curtain airbags. . .and how many cars sold in North America have a 5 star crash rating on <b>all 4 sides</b>? (I'll give you a hint - I drive 2 of them). I can have a conversation in a normal tone of voice on the highway, and not feel totally wiped out after a 6 hour drive.
If 'Canadian Cars' are losing their luster, I just don't see it.
Plus, they are a hell of a lot of fun.