|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:57 pm
Wada Wada: tritium tritium: Wada Wada: tritium tritium: I'm all for the death penalty, you kill you get killed.
An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Canada should stay out of it. I think your absolutely right! You accidentally kill some kid with your car then the deceased's family should have the prerogative to run you over or one of your family. The one thing I don't like about this idea is if you wack me upside the head by your logic I can only hit ya back once and I know that just won't appease my anger. We definitely need to discuss this further dude.  Yeah, no. Nice try. Vehicular Manslaughter, no. First Degree murder where it has been proven an intentional killing of another, by all means the death penalty.  No need for expensive gas chambers or injection beds. To the gallows with you. Even cheaper would be a power pack for a Taser and it adds a thrill to the event because if the murderer should possibly live then you could have him/her spin a wheel to see if they get Tasered again or shot in the knee or what have you. Dude. Your only half dreaming again. 
It's plain that you don't agree with capital punishment.
However, 12 years living in Texas, I had no problem with the Texas justice system and death penalty.
As a matter of fact, Texas has a fast track to the death penalty. Why keep these murderers behind bars paying for them at tax payers expense.
Even in Canada, many Canadians go to bed without 3 square meals, but Canadian Tax payers pay for lifers clean sheets and clothes, medical, dental, 3 meals a day, free cable.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:58 pm
ridenrain ridenrain: Here's a new poster boy for Dion to get behind. $1: Deportation may not stop sex offender Man, 48, wanted in U.S. may be released at border and return to Canada Susan Lazaruk, The Province Published: Thursday, November 22, 2007 A wanted U.S. sex offender with a 30-year history of violent and sexual crimes is facing deportation this week -- his fourth order in five years.
But British Columbians who have followed the case for years fear Denver Todd Carnes could end up in Canada again. http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/ ... 6ddd664ba6
Don't worry.
He can always flip-flop like harper did on Iraq.
Semi-unrelated but WTH. 
|
Posts: 6932
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:02 pm
Wada Wada: tritium tritium: Wada Wada: tritium tritium: I'm all for the death penalty, you kill you get killed.
An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Canada should stay out of it. I think your absolutely right! You accidentally kill some kid with your car then the deceased's family should have the prerogative to run you over or one of your family. The one thing I don't like about this idea is if you wack me upside the head by your logic I can only hit ya back once and I know that just won't appease my anger. We definitely need to discuss this further dude.  Yeah, no. Nice try. Vehicular Manslaughter, no. First Degree murder where it has been proven an intentional killing of another, by all means the death penalty.  No need for expensive gas chambers or injection beds. To the gallows with you. Even cheaper would be a power pack for a Taser and it adds a thrill to the event because if the murderer should possibly live then you could have him/her spin a wheel to see if they get Tasered again or shot in the knee or what have you. Dude. Your only half dreaming again. 
Actually the cheapest way would be to just drop him off on the corner by Suzy's Diner and Beer Store in Browning Montana.
Hey Ronnie, want to go for a ride 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:04 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: Would you feel that way if it were a Canadian or American facing the "justice" of an islamic country because they had broken their laws? First off, if I went to an Islamic country I would respect their customs and traditions, and wouldn't murder someone. ...and yes their laws are barbaric. However, as a guest in their country, if I fuck up, I pay the price and a young American boy did in the Philippines who spray painted graffiti on the walls. He got whipped. DerbyX DerbyX: Canada outlawed the death penalty and even though I disagree with that I respect the fact that our federal gov't should continue with our well established tradition of opposing the death penalty for our citizens abroad, at least as an automatic appeal.
If we reinstated the death penalty here in Canada then Harper might have a leg to stand on but he doesn't. Its just a way to weasel out of his PM responsibilities.
Canada needs to stay out of the affairs of the USA.
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:08 pm
Alta_redneck Alta_redneck: Wada Wada: tritium tritium: Wada Wada: tritium tritium: I'm all for the death penalty, you kill you get killed.
An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.
Canada should stay out of it. I think your absolutely right! You accidentally kill some kid with your car then the deceased's family should have the prerogative to run you over or one of your family. The one thing I don't like about this idea is if you wack me upside the head by your logic I can only hit ya back once and I know that just won't appease my anger. We definitely need to discuss this further dude.  Yeah, no. Nice try. Vehicular Manslaughter, no. First Degree murder where it has been proven an intentional killing of another, by all means the death penalty.  No need for expensive gas chambers or injection beds. To the gallows with you. Even cheaper would be a power pack for a Taser and it adds a thrill to the event because if the murderer should possibly live then you could have him/her spin a wheel to see if they get Tasered again or shot in the knee or what have you. Dude. Your only half dreaming again.  Actually the cheapest way would be to just drop him off on the corner by Suzy's Diner and Beer Store in Browning Montana. Hey Ronnie, want to go for a ride 
What is that from Brokeback Mountain or something?
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:46 pm
Tritium Tritium: First off, if I went to an Islamic country I would respect their customs and traditions, and wouldn't murder someone.
...and yes their laws are barbaric. However, as a guest in their country, if I fuck up, I pay the price and a young American boy did in the Philippines who spray painted graffiti on the walls. He got A sentiment not held by the bulk of those posting "let him fry". They would expect Canada to save any Canadian facing punishment for breaking a lwa we consider contemptuous. Imagine a Canadian female facing 200 lashes for traveling with a male companion. That their laws. Of course I could point out that invading them does far worse in disrespecting their laws then anything. $1: Canada needs to stay out of the affairs of the USA.
Since its humble beginnings the US has rarely respected the affairs of other nations, given that they are currently invading 2 nations who didn't threaten it in the least.
As ye reap so shall ye sow.
Whne the US stays out of the affairs of other nations then your statement will ring true.
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:24 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: Tritium Tritium: First off, if I went to an Islamic country I would respect their customs and traditions, and wouldn't murder someone.
...and yes their laws are barbaric. However, as a guest in their country, if I fuck up, I pay the price and a young American boy did in the Philippines who spray painted graffiti on the walls. He got A sentiment not held by the bulk of those posting "let him fry". They would expect Canada to save any Canadian facing punishment for breaking a lwa we consider contemptuous. Imagine a Canadian female facing 200 lashes for traveling with a male companion. That their laws. Of course I could point out that invading them does far worse in disrespecting their laws then anything. Take for instance a news corespondent, female travelling to Saudi Arabia. They adhere to the local customs and laws for women. If you feel as a person you can not follow the laws of a foreign country, I'd suggest as a Canadian, American, or whatever.. don't go there. It's like eating at McDonalds. For God's sake, McDonlad's is not forcing you to eat their hamburgers, but people try to sue the company. People need to take responsibility for their own actions and quit expecting to be saved or bailed out by the government. DerbyX DerbyX: Tritium Tritium: Canada needs to stay out of the affairs of the USA. Since its humble beginnings the US has rarely respected the affairs of other nations, given that they are currently invading 2 nations who didn't threaten it in the least. As ye reap so shall ye sow. Whne the US stays out of the affairs of other nations then your statement will ring true.
"Do as I say and not as I do." How many times have we all heard that expression? It's such an old-fashioned thing to say.
Yes the United States has a very bad habit of invading and sticking it nose into other nations governmental affairs. So because the United States does it so should we.
... or should we set an example. The man killed 2 people, was convicted by a jury and has to pay for his crime under the jurisdiction in which he did the crime.
Is it somehow Canada's fault he went to the United States and murdered two people. Nope, nothing to do with us, other than he is a Canadian that is a total fucking douche bag murdering piece of scum that is going to get the needle for his crime.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:33 pm
$1: Take for instance a news corespondent, female travelling to Saudi Arabia.
They adhere to the local customs and laws for women. If you feel as a person you can not follow the laws of a foreign country, I'd suggest as a Canadian, American, or whatever.. don't go there.
It's like eating at McDonalds. For God's sake, McDonlad's is not forcing you to eat their hamburgers, but people try to sue the company.
People need to take responsibility for their own actions and quit expecting to be saved or bailed out by the government.
We don't. As you just posted we don't. Our society does not take responsibility for its actions. Thats why we have fat people suing MDs for giving selling them food. We don't. $1: "Do as I say and not as I do." How many times have we all heard that expression? It's such an old-fashioned thing to say.
Yes the United States has a very bad habit of invading and sticking it nose into other nations governmental affairs. So because the United States does it so should we. A good point. I say the US has no right to bitch therefore their criticism is fluff. $1: ... or should we set an example. The man killed 2 people, was convicted by a jury and has to pay for his crime under the jurisdiction in which he did the crime. In this example. Our policy covers everybody including those falsely convicted. Far to many for my liking. $1: Is it somehow Canada's fault he went to the United States and murdered two people. Nope, nothing to do with us, other than he is a Canadian that is a total fucking douche bag murdering piece of scum that is going to get the needle for his crime.
Sure thats bad.
He invaded the US and killed 2 people. The US invaded Iraq/Afghanistan and killed how many?
I guess justice only applies on the small scale eh?
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:46 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: Sure thats bad.
He invaded the US and killed 2 people. The US invaded Iraq/Afghanistan and killed how many?
I guess justice only applies on the small scale eh?
Not just a small scale, look at how many young soldiers have lost their lives and families broken. (both in Canada and the USA)
I liked the idea that Bush had the balls to go against the world community to get Saddam, but once he got Saddam the U.S. should have gotten the hell outta there.
When the US removed Saddams guard as the national police force, and started training new soldiers that was a truning point downward. Major screw up on the part of the Bush administration.
He should have refocused the military on Afghanistan and Bin Laden.
Iraq is a total clusterfuck now.

|
Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:59 pm
$1: Not just a small scale, look at how many young soldiers have lost their lives and families broken. (both in Canada and the USA) An argument in my favour. $1: I liked the idea that Bush had the balls to go against the world community to get Saddam, but once he got Saddam the U.S. should have gotten the hell outta there. bush is a petty fucking coward dictator. Saddam wasn't so repulsive when he was a US ally facing off against Iran. Bush wanted oil and a christian victory nothing more. To achieve that goal he was willing to sacrifice many US lives as well as a great many innocent people. Of that their is no dispute. $1: When the US removed Saddams guard as the national police force, and started training new soldiers that was a truning point downward. Major screw up on the part of the Bush administration.
He should have refocused the military on Afghanistan and Bin Laden.
Total clusterfuck now. No. The US shoukld mind its own buisness and just as you claim Tritium Tritium: Canada needs to stay out of the affairs of the USA.
Just substitute "Canada" for the US and "USA" for every other country in the world.
The US should fucking stick to its own buisness and butt the hell out of situations that doesn't concern it.
Then your point will have greater support.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
[ 40 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests |
|
|