[ridenrain]

DerbyX DerbyX:

I don't like you.

I think that people like you are entirely the reason we have the problems we do in Canada with respect to east - west friction.

I think you typify what I find very common in Canada, in that most people expect far more then their gov't can give and simply ignore all the good things they have done seeking to hold bad examples up with far greater weight all in the name pf partisan politics.

The debt wizardry is absolute proof. Any honest and non-partisan person can see that the Liberals did what was absolutely necessary and they did it in a way that was designed to produce as rapid a turnaround with as little additional tax hikes and budget cuts as possible.

You guys all scream murder over BS nonesense about taking money from EI funds and/or pension plans but thats just partisan smoke and mirrors.

Hell, they did it in a way that most conservatives support wholeheartedly and were far more fiscally conservative then any gov't in the last 50 years including Harpers.

I hate the fact that they choose the absolute least possible partisan and the choice that benefitted everyone equally. They coulds have taken their surplus and simply poured it into "Liberal friendly" endeavours buying votes left and right but they didn't.

They, more then any other party or gov't, did something that was entirely for the good of the country as a whole. For that they get dumped on by partisan people like you who simply cannot adnit they did anything good.

I'm not interested in your latest red herring because all you are trying to do is not answer what you know will either force you to lie or admit that Harper has done something you have said you find reprehensible and tantamout to losing your support.

Its actually kinda clever switching to the china syndrome because not only do you avoid answering my direct questions you validify your dodge by not demanding I answer the question you threw at me.

Nice try. I want and answer. You made the bet and I raised. You can either call or fold (we've reached the raise limit). You choose.

BTW, You claim I don't recognize when you bitch about your own party but as can be plaining read in previous posted that has become "You don't complain anywhere near the same degree whne your side does it".

That fact is quite evident. As for me not taking my own party to task, well I did just that over gun registry and kyoto. You just weren't party to those debates.

Call or fold.

Lock it down.
I'm not going to follow that up.

[ridenrain]

But I will say that that's a hell of a dramatic way to avoid commenting on the Mulroney affair.

[DerbyX]

ridenrain ridenrain:

DerbyX DerbyX:

I don't like you.

I think that people like you are entirely the reason we have the problems we do in Canada with respect to east - west friction.

I think you typify what I find very common in Canada, in that most people expect far more then their gov't can give and simply ignore all the good things they have done seeking to hold bad examples up with far greater weight all in the name pf partisan politics.

The debt wizardry is absolute proof. Any honest and non-partisan person can see that the Liberals did what was absolutely necessary and they did it in a way that was designed to produce as rapid a turnaround with as little additional tax hikes and budget cuts as possible.

You guys all scream murder over BS nonesense about taking money from EI funds and/or pension plans but thats just partisan smoke and mirrors.

Hell, they did it in a way that most conservatives support wholeheartedly and were far more fiscally conservative then any gov't in the last 50 years including Harpers.

I hate the fact that they choose the absolute least possible partisan and the choice that benefitted everyone equally. They coulds have taken their surplus and simply poured it into "Liberal friendly" endeavours buying votes left and right but they didn't.

They, more then any other party or gov't, did something that was entirely for the good of the country as a whole. For that they get dumped on by partisan people like you who simply cannot adnit they did anything good.

I'm not interested in your latest red herring because all you are trying to do is not answer what you know will either force you to lie or admit that Harper has done something you have said you find reprehensible and tantamout to losing your support.

Its actually kinda clever switching to the china syndrome because not only do you avoid answering my direct questions you validify your dodge by not demanding I answer the question you threw at me.

Nice try. I want and answer. You made the bet and I raised. You can either call or fold (we've reached the raise limit). You choose.

BTW, You claim I don't recognize when you bitch about your own party but as can be plaining read in previous posted that has become "You don't complain anywhere near the same degree whne your side does it".

That fact is quite evident. As for me not taking my own party to task, well I did just that over gun registry and kyoto. You just weren't party to those debates.

Call or fold.

Lock it down.
I'm not going to follow that up.

Thats because you can't. I've busted your inherent dishonest partisan tactics and your utter refusal to answer the very criticism of your party that you dish out on an hourly basis.

You are done.

On yer bike.

[DerbyX]

ridenrain ridenrain:

But I will say that that's a hell of a dramatic way to avoid commenting on the Mulroney affair.

No, You were told exactly what you had to do and it was you who dodged, twisted, and cast out red herrings to avoid answering up.

Done as dinner old boy,

[ridenrain]

You didn't address any of the points reguarding the China thread, even though it was you who brought it up again.

You go off on some emotional rollercoaster on me in you're continuing attempt to paint "all of us" the same.
All east-west problems are caused by "us", and Quebec is simply an innocent bystander or perhaps an overpaid mistress. Gosh knows the east west debate has been going on since the country started, but somehow this is now directly mine & Harpers fault.
EI problems are also our fault. It has nothing to do with Abotech, stealing money from RCMP pension funds or even those darned eastern fishermen.
All these, and more are the cause of the Conservatives, even though there is an even slimmer connection between the modern CPC and the PCs , considering many of the name holders for the PC party joined the Liberals. Totally different than the Liberals who put in a new leader and pretend to be as brand new as a skid row crack hooker with some wet wipes.

We can go back a few pages where I said I'd apologise if you found me a Liberal bill giving Alberta and BC more seats. You cant find that so you ran off on a tangent, fingers in ears, shouting party slogans.
Then you start demanding questions of me.

What can you guess, I don't want to talk to you.

Now, like the puppet you are.. you can't just leave this thread without getting in the last word because it looks like volume and the last word equal the win.
Come on.. post, puppet post!