[PublicAnimalNo9]

Tricks Tricks:

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

bootlegga bootlegga:

The nutjobs on the right just run people over with their car or shoot them with an AR-15.

Do the nutjobs on the right constantly engage in faux moral outrage over violence against women? Do the nutjobs on the right keep yapping on about how violence is never the solution?

PS. The AR-15 is very rarely used in shootings.

No, they just commit the violence to an overwhelming degree.

Do they though? Or does the media simply want to portray that. There sure was no faux moral outrage on the left when that vegan lesbian shot some place up. There certainly wasn't any when that islamic terror camp was uncovered in New Mexico. And there was even less when the perpetrators were released without bail because the prosecution couldn't prove that them teaching kids to commit mass shootings was enough to warrant dangerous offender status.
Recently the "mainstream" media up here said we should sympathize with the Danforth shooter's parents, even though there is a potential connection to radical islam there. And yet no calls for sympathy for the victims' families.

It's the exact same game the media plays when it only portrays cops shooting Black people. In fact, over the last 5-7 years, if you were new to the US and knew nothing about what went on in that country, you'd be left with a clear impression that cops only shoot Black people. Which of course is utter nonsense.

Here's the thing. About 80% of the people who work in the news media are liberals. Some are normal liberals while more and more are of them are neo-liberal, ALT-left fascists.
A few years ago I ran across a study listing where the major news outlets in North America were located on the political spectrum. Fox News and CNN were on opposite ends of the scale. Fox was barely clinging on to the right end of the graph while CNN was barely clinging to the left side of the graph. They updated that graph last year. CNN doesn't even show up now. They are basically nothing more than a propaganda mill. The only thing that saves Fox News from falling off the list is the fact they also have local news affiliates.

And in case you were wondering, there were only three outlets in North America that were considered to be centered enough to be 100% objective and unbiased and one of them is a Canadian financial publication.

[Tricks]

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Do they though? Or does the media simply want to portray that.

Since 1990 there have been 36 accusations or investigations into republicans. There have been 13 for the Democrats. So about 75 vs 25%. That's an overwhelming degree in my book.

And lets not forget the catholic church, which is almost entirely a right leaning organization. Or how about any fundamentalist religion? You realise that fundamentalist islam is a far right practice right?

$1:

There sure was no faux moral outrage on the left when that vegan lesbian shot some place up.

Got a link to it?

$1:

There certainly wasn't any when that islamic terror camp was uncovered in New Mexico.

I'm not sure what you're expecting to get out of people. You're aware a terrorist training camp has the default position of being bad right? The reason to you see so much news surrounding stuff like Kavanaugh is because there is disagreement. I don't think you'd find many democrats who disagree with shutting down the compound.

$1:

And there was even less when the perpetrators were released without bail because the prosecution couldn't prove that them teaching kids to commit mass shootings was enough to warrant dangerous offender status.

Which was done because of an amendment that New Mexico voters passed (87% for it). That's democracy for you.

$1:

Recently the "mainstream" media up here said we should sympathize with the Danforth shooter's parents, even though there is a potential connection to radical islam there. And yet no calls for sympathy for the victims' families.

Wait so the potential for things is good enough now? So you don't think Kavanaugh should be confirmed. Since there is a potential he's an attempted rapist right? I thought it was all innocent until proven guilty?

$1:

It's the exact same game the media plays when it only portrays cops shooting Black people. In fact, over the last 5-7 years, if you were new to the US and knew nothing about what went on in that country, you'd be left with a clear impression that cops only shoot Black people. Which of course is utter nonsense.

It is utter nonsense, but to deny that there have been a lot of unarmed black men shot by cops in that last few years is also utter nonsense.

$1:

Here's the thing. About 80% of the people who work in the news media are liberals. Some are normal liberals while more and more are of them are neo-liberal, ALT-left fascists.
A few years ago I ran across a study listing where the major news outlets in North America were located on the political spectrum. Fox News and CNN were on opposite ends of the scale. Fox was barely clinging on to the right end of the graph while CNN was barely clinging to the left side of the graph. They updated that graph last year. CNN doesn't even show up now. They are basically nothing more than a propaganda mill. The only thing that saves Fox News from falling off the list is the fact they also have local news affiliates.

And in case you were wondering, there were only three outlets in North America that were considered to be centered enough to be 100% objective and unbiased and one of them is a Canadian financial publication.

I think if you paid attention around here, I'd be the first to say current journalism is a sham. I don't disagree whatsoever that the current state of ethics and impartiality in journalism is a major threat to a well informed democracy.

[martin14]

https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2018/10/0 ... hFuMlG3bcA

$1:

Toronto police say they've made an arrest in an incident that was caught on video during a recent anti-abortion protest.

Investigators say a man approached demonstrators at a peaceful rally in the city's west end last Sunday and "began scribbling on their signs and clothing" with ink markers.

When he was confronted by one of the protesters, police say the man "kicked her in the shoulder, knocking her phone from her hand."

$1:

Police say 26-year-old Jordan Hunt turned himself in on Saturday, and has been charged with eight counts of assault and seven counts of mischief.

Looks like the woman kicking leftist hero has been up to more than just the one woman.

[BeaverFever]

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Tricks Tricks:

No, they just commit the violence to an overwhelming degree.

Do they though? Or does the media simply want to portray that. There sure was no faux moral outrage on the left when that vegan lesbian shot some place up. There certainly wasn't any when that islamic terror camp was uncovered in New Mexico. And there was even less when the perpetrators were released without bail because the prosecution couldn't prove that them teaching kids to commit mass shootings was enough to warrant dangerous offender status.
Recently the "mainstream" media up here said we should sympathize with the Danforth shooter's parents, even though there is a potential connection to radical islam there. And yet no calls for sympathy for the victims' families.

It's the exact same game the media plays when it only portrays cops shooting Black people. In fact, over the last 5-7 years, if you were new to the US and knew nothing about what went on in that country, you'd be left with a clear impression that cops only shoot Black people. Which of course is utter nonsense.

Here's the thing. About 80% of the people who work in the news media are liberals. Some are normal liberals while more and more are of them are neo-liberal, ALT-left fascists.
A few years ago I ran across a study listing where the major news outlets in North America were located on the political spectrum. Fox News and CNN were on opposite ends of the scale. Fox was barely clinging on to the right end of the graph while CNN was barely clinging to the left side of the graph. They updated that graph last year. CNN doesn't even show up now. They are basically nothing more than a propaganda mill. The only thing that saves Fox News from falling off the list is the fact they also have local news affiliates.

And in case you were wondering, there were only three outlets in North America that were considered to be centered enough to be 100% objective and unbiased and one of them is a Canadian financial publication.

Where do you get your horseshit from? Nobody on the left was upset by a shooting because the shooter was “a vegan lesbian“? Lie.

And there was no “Islamic terror compound” in New Mexico either and they weren’t training kids to commmit mass shootings. There were no terrorism related charges in that case.

Clearly you’re very poorly informed and so your critique of media bias is pretty suspect. Where do you get your disinformation from?

[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Where do you get your horseshit from? Nobody on the left was upset by a shooting because the shooter was “a vegan lesbian“? Lie.

Not exactly. Best guess is he's talking about Nasim Aghdam. She was a vegan, animal rights activist. The reason you haven't heard of her probably has more to do with the fact the shooting traced to her being upset with YouTube censorship. The leftist media doesn't seem too interested in that topic.

The idea she was a lesbian probably has more to do with the meme that so many lesbians are vegans. If that applied to Nasim though there's no published evidence that I know of. Placing the 2 terms together would be more a rhetorical flourish, I think.

On this though...

$1:

And there was no “Islamic terror compound” in New Mexico

Sure there was. The bulk of the charges were dismissed on a technicality but this fact below never changed:

"The occupants of the compound were "most likely heavily armed and considered extremist of the Muslim belief," an official said at the time."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/3-extremist- ... ll-charges

$1:

Clearly you’re very poorly informed

Look in the mirror when you say that.

[N_Fiddledog]

Oh and here's a link to the Asim Naghdam story with many embedded supporting links inside:

After YouTube Shooting, We Need Better Vegan Activist Control

Can somebody get in touch with Tricks and tell him he owes us one on this claim:

$1:

"Since 1990 there have been 36 accusations or investigations into republicans. There have been 13 for the Democrats. So about 75 vs 25%. That's an overwhelming degree in my book."

I'd really like to know what he's talking about and how it pertains to politically centred violence. I've seen similar claims and they turned out to be false.

[N_Fiddledog]

[Tricks]

Tricks Tricks:

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Do they though? Or does the media simply want to portray that.

Since 1990 there have been 36 accusations or investigations into republicans. There have been 13 for the Democrats. So about 75 vs 25%. That's an overwhelming degree in my book.

This was wrong. I haven't been able to get on until now to correct it. The list I used was any and all "sex scandals" which included affairs. Taking those out, it was largely equal. Did notice this until later that day.

Religious institutions still stand though.

[N_Fiddledog]

Here's a companion piece to the Hero-Hunt, kicker of women story.

Now entering the ring Gorilla Gabby, showing us women can thug too. Just give them a metal clip to huck.

$1:

It's open season on pro-life women in Canada, where, in the past two weeks as many as two women have been assaulted by zealous abortion crazies whose self-righteousness on the virtues of baby-killing have motivated their violent behavior.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/37018/wa ... -paul-bois

[BartSimpson]

Tricks Tricks:

And lets not forget the catholic church, which is almost entirely a right leaning organization.

Um, no.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/20 ... -leanings/

$1:

Catholics are divided politically in our survey, just as they were in the 2012 election. While 37% say they favor the GOP, 44% identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party (and 19% say they do not lean either way). In the 2012 election, 50% of Catholics said they voted for Obama, while 48% voted for Romney.

[N_Fiddledog]

This new pope is pretty much a Commie, if you ask me.

[Tricks]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Tricks Tricks:

And lets not forget the catholic church, which is almost entirely a right leaning organization.

Um, no.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/20 ... -leanings/

$1:

Catholics are divided politically in our survey, just as they were in the 2012 election. While 37% say they favor the GOP, 44% identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party (and 19% say they do not lean either way). In the 2012 election, 50% of Catholics said they voted for Obama, while 48% voted for Romney.

I'm not talking parishioners. I'm talking about the organization. Catholic priests, according to a study done by verdant, are just shy of 75% republican.

http://verdantlabs.com/politics_of_prof ... index.html

You also can't ignore that major points of contention in the last 10-20 years like abortion, gay marriage, birth control, stem-cell research, republicans have favoured the religious side of the arguments. Not all republicans, but the majority.

Additionally, you have farm more republican candidates expressing their deeply held religious beliefs, or talking about how their religion drives their policy decisions, than you do democrats.