DrCaleb DrCaleb:
bootlegga bootlegga:
I wasn't commenting on the wheat board's ability to ship grain, I was commenting on Andy's idea that oil shipments were the main cause of shipment delays.
I'd agree that the CWB had the muscle to get it moving because it had controlled so much business. Now, farmers simply don't have the market clout to get the same results.
Right. I was supporting andy. As in my response to Regina, if there are limited sized to the trains then the railroad will get the most profitable cargo moving. If oil brings them more revenue than grain in someone elses' silo does, then the oil gets shipped.
That is true, but I doubt it is the case.
From the numbers I've heard recently, oil shipments are only about 5-10% of total rail shipments in the past year, i.e. if a train rolls by with 100 cars, 5 to 10 are carrying oil. I've looked for confirmation online of those numbers but haven't found it yet, but given the source, I tend to believe it.
Further, most oil being shipped is not oil from the oilsands, but rather from Bakken, so it's another nail in that coffin IMO;
$1:
Of the million barrels now being shipped by rail in North America, only a small fraction — around 50,000 barrels — consists of the “heavy crude” that is produced in the tar sands; the rest is “light crude” from southern Alberta, Saskatchewan, and the U.S.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/shipping-c ... rs/5360776As such, I'm skeptical that oil shipments are the main reason grain shipments have been delayed. It's certainly possible that it is partly responsible, but entirely...I don't think so.