Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
You're right. Cuts shouldn't be based on pain equality but, should be based on redundancy in the area that is under question which means the Gov't should be able to defend its position on cuts with facts and not just a boorish attitude towards those people affected.
But, by the same token those affected shouldn't continually play the martyr and should be able to defend their position with facts like we expect the Gov't to. Then people could make an informed decision on the subject which, even if they couldn't do anything about it now, could express their agreement or disagreement during the next election.
The government isn't shy about its actions, and uses its own methods to manipulate public opinion. Why should those opposed to government actions do the same?
The point I was making was that neither side should be doing that and we as the public should be given the truth so we can make an informed decision. One which isn't based on rhetoric and partisan positions.
Junior Member 
