Public_Domain Public_Domain:
Difference between you and I, fascist, is that I deplore the disgusting USSR and its horrific practises, and have very openly made that clear whenever it has been brought up.
Not just the USSR you know. I would be pressed to find a communist nation that didn't do a little bit of mass killing. Maybe a modern Cuba but they didn't get where they are blood free. Which isn't to say how when it was as a gangsters hideaway was good either.
$1:
I would NEVER be "doing the getting"; I'd be got.
Maybe, people are willing to do all sorts of things in the right situation.
~
I bet you are a nationalists socialist too. Do you support social spending and publicly opreated government services? If so you are a socialist. Do you like the nation you live in, not limited to the government but the nation formed of the people and the social structure? If so you are a nationalist. Put them together, then speak German, and you're a Nazi. But we are not German and are speaking english, so you might call yourself a Socialist Nationalist, or a Nationalist Socialist, or a National Socialist, or any other combo. The core point is that if you ignore the historical German Nazi government and what they did, which turned away from Naso at about the 1/3 point, the basic ideas of being a nationalist that believes in socialism isn't wrong and has nothing to do with fascism.
I find the objectivism put forward most famously by Rand to be monsterous to a point past the real life practice of so called communists.
~
I still haven't been moved by the pro pot side's arguments. From my experince they fall into basic groups:
1: Replace everything with stuff made from hemp.
Hemp can be used for a lot of stuff, it doesn't make it the best at anything it can be used for. We are not going to get huge amounts of hemp industry replacing current materials, even with the feed stock being a by product of the for smoking pot industry.
2: Legalize and tax will make huge amount of extra money.
It will make some extra money, however most of the current income earned is spent back into our economy already. Drug producers and dealers buy things too. While the overall spending for pot might be many billions per year, thinking that we will get a flat conversion of the total market into a set tax rate of extra government income is wrong, it follows the same curve of any tax on economic activity.
The total growth of the economy from legalization will be very minor as the industry is already at it's market blanced max. Simply put the black market is filling the demand so don't expect a huge bump in economic growth.
3: Don't put people in jail for breaking drug laws, this will reduce costs of prisons and help people.
Then why not push for all crimes that didn't directly and actively harm someone no longer be crimes? If the logic of it doesn't hurt anyone else so it should be legal is good enough for pot the why not for lots of other activities that are currently crime that don't hurt anyone?
Or another argument for the same point is that people in jail for pot crimes are fighting for a change in law and shouldn't be looked down on. I would counter that just because you don't like a law doesn't mean you can break it without having to be punished. Bad laws can be changed in time with proper orginization and political motivation. Saying I don't like it, I will break it, OMG why are you punishing me is a child's reasoning.
4: Pot is a super drug that cures everything.
Research is more than a little mixed on what the positives and negitives are. Bottom line: The common form of breathing in burnt matter isn't good for you. The side effects of the mix of chemicals that you absorb into your body from using pot are mixed but not clearly better for having it.
People like to get high, I can accept that even if I don't think that's a great justification. However, don't try and sell pot as a the modern day snake oil cure all.