BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The Canadian government would have a right to stop a takeover if there were a compelling national interest that was being protected. Like if a US firm tried to buy Bombardier I'd totally understand the MoD opposing that. But what compelling national interest is represented in a retail outlet? None.
Nopw. Its no different than a foreigner showing up on your border and demanding the right to vote, own a gun and drive a car. If a foreign business suddenly shows up and demands the the rights and privileges of Canadian incorporation, they have to pass a test.
Furthermore, the government has to believe that a takeover is not going to adversely affect the market by eliminating competition and creating a monopoly/oligopoly and that there will be a "net benefit" to Canadians. Finally, they want to make sure that the acquisition of a Canadian company is in fact, investment in Canada and not going to be sitatuion where a foreign entity outside our legal jurisdiction is raiding Canadian pension funds, killing jobs, ripping off other Canadian companies, and/or dodging taxes etc. Its probably the same in the US. Buying up businesses is not an inalienable right, I dont know why you think it would be.