[2Cdo]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Since you aren't even smart enough to remember your own words let me refresh you.

http://www.canadaka.net/modules.php?nam ... c&start=60

I understand that you are to much of a crybaby to be a man of your word and to much of a hypocrite to police your own so instead of making even an attempt at an intelligent post all you can manage is crying like a little girl with a skinned knee.

It just to bad that your own parties MPs considered it a bribe and its to bad you aren't smart enough to understand it.

I expect nothing less then a hoghschool dropout who joined the military because his other career choice of working in McDonalds suddenly raised their standards.

Off you go now troll.

Let's see here, you're link was me referring to you as a hypocrite, nothing new here.

If there is any REAL EVIDENCE then I will condemn the guilty, until then I will defend the "innocent until proven guilty".

Wow, I'm now not smart because I don't buy your "PROOF IS A PROOF" nonsense.

But here's where you truly shine,

$1:

I expect nothing less then a hoghschool dropout who joined the military because his other career choice of working in McDonalds suddenly raised their standards.

Note the high-light Einstein. As for the high school dropout comment, it truly shows that I have raised your ire to the point where you assume to know anything about me other than the fact that I am in the military. Your Liberal bias shines through loud and clear as to what you think of average Canadians who serve in the military. Hypocrite.

[DerbyX]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

whaa whaa Liberals... Whaa.

Are you still here?

[Benoit]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

If there is any REAL EVIDENCE then I will condemn the guilty

It is next to impossible to believe.

[Wally_Sconce]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

[Benoit]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

I'm waiting...!

[DerbyX]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

When you start to practice what you preach you might learn something.

[Benoit]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

When you start to practice what you preach you might learn something.

Hello!

[DerbyX]

Benoit Benoit:

Hello!

Yes? Looking for attention?

[Benoit]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Benoit Benoit:

Hello!

Yes? Looking for attention?

ego vs ego vs ego

[Wally_Sconce]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

This kind of situation is a lot like a custody battle where everyone it pointing and waiving their finger at each other.

A lot of stuff can be said and twisted outside of a court room, especially when we are relying on liberal media for the facts.

When it's all said and done, the only parts that matter are the parts that are admisable in court.

Unless of course its rumours and innuendo against the Liberals.

If you were able even for a second to look beyond your rabid anti-Liberalism you would see that all the cons on her who previously convicted the Liberals based entriely on rumours or the words of a few individuals suddenly did an about face and demanded videotape evidence.

They even dismissed the evidence given by their own candidates when it didn't suit their pre-conceived notions.

pathetic.

liberal media doesn't print romours and innuendo about the has been Liberals

Sure.

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the cons is showing.

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Liberals and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a Liberal trick.

If this had been the Liberals who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there skippy.

w.r.t the adscam...

In the end your hypocracy and that of all the Liberals is showing. That is why Canada booted their ass out of government

You demand a level of evidence far exceeding what you used to convict the Conservative Party of Canada, and even when there is ample evidence of deliberate malfeasance you either dismiss it or call it a conservative trick.

If this had been the Conservatives who did this then you guys would already have had them tarred and feathered.

Practice what you preach there Derby-ex

You can keep trying to copy my words like a pesky younger sibling but in the end your own stupidity and political hackery is the only thing evident.

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

When you start to practice what you preach you might learn something.

There you go copying me.

Again

[DerbyX]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

There you go copying me.

Again

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

[Wally_Sconce]

I don't really care if you think I need to learn to read. It's of no concern to me. I do note though that you resorted to this thing about reading as soon as I asked you to discuss your beliefs.

Predictable. You always get defensive and rude when someone asks you to be consistent.

I don't care about changing your opinion. You are nothing to me. I just want to show it for what it is and where it comes from. Then I hope that enough Canadians see it for what it is and keep the likes of you in the irrelevant minority where you have always been.

[Benoit]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

There you go copying me.

Again

Why not? your last half dozen posts to me are built around copying my words. Once again, you don't practise what you preach.

PMO denies trying to bribe dying MP Cadman

[DerbyX]

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

I don't really care if you think I need to learn to read. It's of no concern to me. I do note though that you resorted to this thing about reading as soon as I asked you to discuss your beliefs.

Predictable. You always get defensive and rude when someone asks you to be consistent.

I don't care about changing your opinion. You are nothing to me. I just want to show it for what it is and where it comes from. Then I hope that enough Canadians see it for what it is and keep the likes of you in the irrelevant minority where you have always been.

You did nothing of the sort.

You started the insults in the YVR thread before I even knew who you were.

You keep attacking me because I defend the Libs and complain that I simply won't accept your bigotted opinion.

Keep crying though because your mother might hear you and actually care enough to feed you.

[Benoit]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck:

I don't really care if you think I need to learn to read. It's of no concern to me. I do note though that you resorted to this thing about reading as soon as I asked you to discuss your beliefs.

Predictable. You always get defensive and rude when someone asks you to be consistent.

I don't care about changing your opinion. You are nothing to me. I just want to show it for what it is and where it comes from. Then I hope that enough Canadians see it for what it is and keep the likes of you in the irrelevant minority where you have always been.

You did nothing of the sort.

You started the insults in the YVR thread before I even knew who you were.

You keep attacking me because I defend the Libs and complain that I simply won't accept your bigotted opinion.

Keep crying though because your mother might hear you and actually care enough to feed you.

send private messages.