EyeBrock EyeBrock:
You just can't leave it alone can you?
Says the hypocrite that responds with a Karma bomb post
$1:
Why are you so angry all the time?
I'm not, Dr. Phil. Why are you constantly intellectually insecure?
$1:
Really you should consider how your conduct of late looks to everybody else.
Really, you should follow your own advice - YOU, not me, started with the condescending tone, and YOU, not me, instigated it, and you're hardly the epitome of civil discourse. In fact, this was the exact same tact you've taken with others, so clean up your messes first before chastising others.
$1:
I have nothing against you mustang, but you make it very hard to like you. You obviously don't care what people think otherwise you would approach these things differently.
Yes, you do. You, not me, has invested personally in this - many credible members
from Dayseed to Zipperfish have affirmed my points regarding what was sociall permissiable in 1991. You have to resort to this kind of self-righteous attention whoring because if you didn't, you'd have to make a point.
$1:
It isn't all about ramming your argument down people’s throat and then declaring victory, or getting the last word in with a sarcastic one liner. Really, it's not a mature way of doing business.
I agree, but you don't make arguments - you constantly resort to logical fallacies and personal slurs. I made several relevant points that were left not addressed in your follow-up victim-crying posts. Sorry, your as guilty as i am, but the difference is, i'm not sanctimoniously calling for you to stop.
$1:
Are you not supposed to be 38 years old?
Uhh...no. And how would that excuse your conduct? The fact here is that you're a blatant hypocrite. You decry insults while insulting, you chastise education while trying to push civility and you claim these exchanges are beneath you (this was after I was accused of arrogance - more hypocrisies) yet you devote entire posts to personal attacks.
$1:
Have you spent some much time in school that the high-school methods of conflict resolution are still your default?
There's nothing to resolve here. You were wrong. I wouldn't even push the issue if you didn't keep retreating to these long diatribes (again, didn't you hypocritically accuse me of the same thing?) that are only designed to insult and personalize trivial matter
$1:
This is a discussion forum and your conduct of late is no better than some of the obnoxious posters that come and go from this forum.
Firstly, this is always my conduct. And secondly, why would I take seriously anything you puke out when you're guilty yourself of each misstep you decry?
$1:
I would say a good majority of us 'regulars' have been on the other end of one of your caustic and sarcastic posts at one time, now it's my turn for the wrath of mustang is it?
Everyone has a run in with everyone at some point and some can't let it drop. So what? It doesn't bother me that some don't like me because i've exposed their ignorance or challenged their bigotry or questioned their subjective stances. So what? Some people I get along fine with (even those I've had a significant run in with)
$1:
Well, dealing with bullies is what I do for a living and you are no different that many bullies I see daily.
Really, your reputation for bullying is growing fast.
Predictable. You personally attack me while simultaneously crying victim. I'd more concerned about your cry-baby rep.
$1:
I've had several PM's of you from past ‘victims’ of yours on this thread, all of which concur with my posts challenging your conduct, which you will no doubt sneeringly class as 'cheer leaders'.
Really? Who? Of course they're cheerleaders - they're likely people that have had their ignorance busted wide open and now carry a grudge. So? That's hardly persuasive. In fact, i'll bet this is the same group that has numerous warnings about infractions, been temporarily banned and therefore carry little weight. Has Zipperfish contacted you? Derby? Regina? Rev? Dayseed? Spr? Brenda? Xerxes? Arctic? WDHIII? Streaker? They're regulars and I respect their opinions
$1:
When a good chunk of people are saying the same thing about you, maybe you need to rethink your delivery method.
Firstly, define "good chunk". Secondly, unless these people are virtually flawless in their decorum, i'm not interested in your self-righteous high school gossip whispering.
$1:
Or you can just go on pissing people off, one person at a time until there is no good-will towards you left on this forum. But would you even care about that? I couldn’t say really.
Why do you even think your opinion matters? Or the other guy who's a sexist? Or the guy who's a bigot? Or the girl that denies objective truth? Or the other one that slams Canada? Or the one that pushes an agenda? You're assuming that their opinions carry weight. Not with me.
$1:
Personally I'd rather try and get on with you but compromise does not seem to be something you value. What exactly are you trying to achieve with this attitude?
Bull. You're an obstinate, anti-intellectual gossip-monger that's more interested in making personal proclamations than trying anything. I gave you an opportunity to prove your point. You insulted. I tried to maintain relevancy. You looked to derail. I noticed both Dayseed and Zipperfish agreed with my point, but you insecurely refused to concede it. You're disingenuous.
$1:
Do us all a favour and try and be a bit easier going.
Do some (you don't speak for CKA, so who's arrogant again?) of us a favor and clean up your act before chastising others and if you don't like what i post, hit the [ignore] button.
CKA Uber 
CKA Uber 
