CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 10896
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:25 am
 


ManifestDestiny ManifestDestiny:
poquas poquas:
ManifestDestiny ManifestDestiny:
You know whats funny African americans in California voted 70% to ban gay marriage.

And because of the high turn out for Blacks it passed. So i geuss the liberals cant have their cake and eat it too.


So much for reasoned debate. :roll:

Here's the clearest characterization of bigotry I've seen yet.



Facts my freind facts. Just cause you dont like them its not my fault.


So true, but you know those liberals, facts always get in the way of calling somebody a biggot


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:31 am
 


herbie herbie:
Simple experiment: copy ANY argument against SSM and paste it into Word.
Find and replace "same sex" or "homosexual" (whatever is used in it) with the word JEW. BLACK, MUSLIM or INTER-RACIAL.
Read the argument again.

If you still fail to see the inherent bigotry in the argument, do the world a favor and jump off a cliff.


That’s so overly simplistic it’s hilarious.

We don’t legislate what religions to believe in. We don’t legislate what race you are going to be. We don’t legislate who you have to love.

I happen to be opposed to legislating SSM and considering it equal to our traditional form of marriage.

Calling me names isn’t likely to change my mind either.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
Profile
Posts: 13928
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:42 am
 


And we have the two biggest biggots on the board jumping to the defence of the newest :roll:

So why is it you are against a same sex couple wanting to profess their love and have it legally binding?


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1453
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:46 am
 


TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
And we have the two biggest biggots on the board jumping to the defence of the newest :roll:

So why is it you are against a same sex couple wanting to profess their love and have it legally binding?


So should we legalize marrying a cow or tree, car?. Might as well if the legal definition is chaging. I do support making it legal but this is the kind of stuff your going to run in to from the OPP

I dont care if they get married, they should be allowed to be miserable like the rest of us


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4914
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:49 am
 


TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
And we have the two biggest biggots on the board jumping to the defence of the newest :roll:

So why is it you are against a same sex couple wanting to profess their love and have it legally binding?



what I find interesting is because someone is against it, they are labeled as a biggot..

why? they don't agree with the lifestyle doesn't make them biggots.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
Profile
Posts: 13928
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:53 am
 


uwish uwish:
TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
And we have the two biggest biggots on the board jumping to the defence of the newest :roll:

So why is it you are against a same sex couple wanting to profess their love and have it legally binding?



what I find interesting is because someone is against it, they are labeled as a biggot..

why? they don't agree with the lifestyle doesn't make them biggots.

Why dont you read their posts and see if you can see how one would come to that conclusion. Defining someone as not 'Normal' or 'Instinctively Repugnant' is biggoted.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1453
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:57 am
 


uwish uwish:


what I find interesting is because someone is against it, they are labeled as a biggot..

why? they don't agree with the lifestyle doesn't make them biggots.


Cause its eaiser to hate then to try and understand another popint of view.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:09 am
 


TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
Why dont you read their posts and see if you can see how one would come to that conclusion. Defining someone as not 'Normal' or 'Instinctively Repugnant' is biggoted.


I thought I explained my position quite clearly, WITHOUT resorting to childish names and charges. The terms I used are clinical factual terms, based on factual statistics. I didn’t resort to name calling or even suggest that anyone else has to believe what I do.

My first post on this forum questioned a member’s (Lily) stubborn refusal to accept any other position to hers without some nonsensical justification.

You called me homophobic and bigoted because I don’t agree with you. So which of us really has a problem. Are you gay and don't want to accpt it? It's ok, really!

You even have an overtly racist member (ManifestDestiny) running amok who appears to be expressing a delusional connection between Blacks and SSM and liberalism. The tinfoil headgear must cost him a fortune. :roll:

Interesting place. :lol:

$1:
Cause its eaiser to hate then to try and understand another popint of view.


:?: :?: Who said anything about hate?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4914
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:12 am
 


if 90% of the population are straight, that can then be defined as a 'normal' baseline. Deviation from that 'norm' is not normal, because it is in the minority of the population.

So saying they are not normal is not biggoted, it is a simple fact. That also does not imply violence, or hatred to said group of people that are in that category.

Sorry that you feel by saying same sex marriage isn't normal but in fact, it isn't. I am not proposing we hunt them down, I am not proposing we stone them, or deny them the same things the 'normal' group have.

But it IS a distinction by definition because it is deviant behavior (from the normal). That doesn't make that statement bigoted.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:35 am
 


TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
Defining someone as not 'Normal' or 'Instinctively Repugnant' is biggoted.


What would you call a mass-murdering pedophile like John Wayne Gacy?

Just curious.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:37 am
 


acidcomplex acidcomplex:
uwish uwish:


what I find interesting is because someone is against it, they are labeled as a biggot..

why? they don't agree with the lifestyle doesn't make them biggots.


Cause its eaiser to hate then to try and understand another popint of view.


So you hate people who don't support gay marriage. Glad we're clear on that. :wink:


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1453
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:50 am
 


poquas poquas:

:?: :?: Who said anything about hate?


Wasnt reffering to you was referring to peoples inabilty to see any other point (such as yours) its eaiser to hate you then try to understand how someone could possibly have a different point of view. ;)


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1453
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:52 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
acidcomplex acidcomplex:
uwish uwish:


what I find interesting is because someone is against it, they are labeled as a biggot..

why? they don't agree with the lifestyle doesn't make them biggots.


Cause its eaiser to hate then to try and understand another popint of view.


So you hate people who don't support gay marriage. Glad we're clear on that. :wink:



lol Exactly :D

Im saying no matter which side your on its esier to hate the other then to try an understand that they could have a different point of view


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:54 am
 


Fair enough. :wink:


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 3646
PostPosted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:57 pm
 


TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:
And we have the two biggest biggots on the board jumping to the defence of the newest :roll:

So why is it you are against a same sex couple wanting to profess their love and have it legally binding?



MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN. Thats why. they can have there own thing and call it co#$sucker union for all I care but dont call it marriage. Let them have their legal binding relationship. Stop trying to ruin the sanctity of Marriage.

Its bad enough the divorce rate has gone through the roof since the P.O.S. 60's

Now you want to force this lemon down our throats. no thank you dont ruin what my meaning of Marriage is and how most people feel about it. thats why i dont like Gay Marriage. MARRIAGE IS BETWEEN MAN AND A WOMAN!!!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 278 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.