eureka eureka:
Try reading it again, PA, and quit lying about what I posted.
I don't have to lie about what you posted. What you post is already lies and bullshit. I'm just providing a free service by pointing them out. Nah it's ok, no need to thank me
$1:
It does not matter a damn how many you bring in without emissions.
Sure it does. You got caught in a lie and now it's burning your ass.
eureka eureka:
And Norway is not what you say it is, btw. But it is not very relevant since it is a very small emitter anyway. Its oil fields have put it into a higher category but it is the only country in the world with a CCS programme and it is used with its oil to bury deep beneath the sea.
Norway is EXACTLY what I said it is. You seem to have this problem where you can't differentiate between emissions from power generation and emissions from other sources. And the fact that Norway is a VERY small emitter actually makes it quite relevant.
eureka eureka:
It is where emissions are going that is a question. Nothing else.
So uh, where's all those emissions going from the coal mines your heroes, Germany, are still operating?
See, this is where your whole argument falls apart. Canada has a 75% emission-free generating capacity. But the "big" contributor to our emissions(apparently) is the oil sands.
Germany isn't anywhere near 75% emission-free power generation and it don't look like they will be anytime soon. They still operate a sizable number of large, open pit coal mines and yet THEY are what we should be aspiring to?
Still waiting to hear where that 8400MW of renewable energy McGuinty had installed are, by the way.