| |
| Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:13 pm
acidcomplex acidcomplex: im so glad this is in effect, swear at me just once and your ass in going to court . About time the public got one back from these dogs It's a regulation, not a law.
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:19 pm
I'm sure he can take a 'private information' out for the criminal offence of swearing Ruez.
Then again, the JP might just laugh at his cop-hating ignorance.
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:24 pm
EyeBrock EyeBrock: I'm sure he can take a 'private information' out for the criminal offence of swearing Ruez.
Then again, the JP might just laugh at his cop-hating ignorance. People like this annoy me. I'd give him five minutes in a world without police.
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:54 pm
He'll call 911 one day. Maybe he should stipulate that only non-swearing cops should save his arse?
|
acidcomplex
Forum Elite
Posts: 1453
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:56 am
hahah bring it on cop lovers, point being its about time the public "got one" or do i need to post all the lovely rcmp fuckups, hmm any come to mind recently??? hhhhmmmmm. The cops are crooks and you guys know it and now thankfully the rest of the public does thanks to the actions as of late by 4 lovely "officers". Its funny how we have the same dedication to our views yet im considered "wrong" by a select few, who i assume are/were wanna be cops lol. Oh look another one http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=45959or maybe this one of busting into the wrong house and arresting a 22 year old mentaly challgned guy http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=45933The proof is staring you in the face only a fool would not recognize there is a problem with the RCMP.
Last edited by acidcomplex on Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
acidcomplex
Forum Elite
Posts: 1453
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:58 am
EyeBrock EyeBrock: acidcomplex acidcomplex: im so glad this is in effect, swear at me just once and your ass in going to court . About time the public got one back from these dogs Nah, maybe not. Poor acid, some nasty cop say a bad word to you? lol nope did once a few years ago, had him charged with verbal abuse and conduct unbecoming of an officer and he was given 2 weeks suspension all be it with pay, but i was happy enough,money buys very very good lawers 
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:14 am
acidcomplex acidcomplex: EyeBrock EyeBrock: acidcomplex acidcomplex: im so glad this is in effect, swear at me just once and your ass in going to court . About time the public got one back from these dogs Nah, maybe not. Poor acid, some nasty cop say a bad word to you? lol nope did once a few years ago, had him charged with verbal abuse and conduct unbecoming of an officer and he was given 2 weeks suspension all be it with pay, but i was happy enough,money buys very very good lawers  That'll teach him to not swear at a rich cop-hating loser eh?
|
Posts: 11907
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:43 pm
acidcomplex acidcomplex: EyeBrock EyeBrock: acidcomplex acidcomplex: im so glad this is in effect, swear at me just once and your ass in going to court . About time the public got one back from these dogs Nah, maybe not. Poor acid, some nasty cop say a bad word to you? lol nope did once a few years ago, had him charged with verbal abuse and conduct unbecoming of an officer and he was given 2 weeks suspension all be it with pay, but i was happy enough,money buys very very good lawers  Sorry but I have to call bullshit on this. You do not decide what charges are brought against someone, funny enough it is the police who decide what charges to bring on a person. And from your general attitude I doubt very much if you have the money to afford a really good lawyer. Flipping burgers at McDonalds does not pay that good. 
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:03 pm
2Cdo,
No point in using logic with this mere child. If the cop was charged, it would have been under the Alberta Police Act and the charge would have been laid by the Police Service.
Therefore no lawyer, expensive or otherwise is required.
So yea 2Cdo, he is full of shite!
|
Posts: 11907
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:05 pm
EyeBrock EyeBrock: 2Cdo,
No point in using logic with this mere child. If the cop was charged, it would have been under the Alberta Police Act and the charge would have been laid by the Police Service.
Therefore no lawyer, expensive or otherwise is required.
So yea 2Cdo, he is full of shite! I know but it's just to easy to expose him as the moron we all know he is. ![Drink up [B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif)
|
Posts: 15681
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:51 am
As you said mate...too easy!
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:12 am
$1: or maybe this one of busting into the wrong house and arresting a 22 year old mentaly challgned guy
I take it you were traumatized by this?
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:48 am
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: $1: or maybe this one of busting into the wrong house and arresting a 22 year old mentaly challgned guy
I take it you were traumatized by this?  SNAP!
|
|
Page 11 of 11
|
[ 163 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
|
|