andyt andyt:
I haven't been looking for any reference. I remember what I read/heard, that will do for me. You don't want to believe it, that's your choice.
$1:
What other alternatives exist between keeping him here to jump the gueue or sending him back?
Sorry. I remember those alternatives, I remember what I've read/heard, that will do it for me. You don't want to believe it, that's your choice.
I can't remember what you've heard or read. That's the point of referencing, especially when some is not so subtly requesting you to. You've requested evidence and proof on this site (in situations very similar to this one -- in fact, you just did by asking for examples), and I should be able to do the same.
I don't think that it would show bias to consider that. In her decision on whether to apply a removal order to a person, the fact of whether or not the person could be persecuted or prosecuted upon returning to their native country is incredibly important to making her decision. None of the articles I have read have had anyone state as such, though, no one involved in the case at the very least. The adjudicator made her choice on the basis of a guarantor paying the bond.
Anyways, as for other possibilities. One is
Humanitarian and Compassionate review (which is why I think you are off base with what you think, because of this possibility.
There are various forms of appeal.
PRRAs. Potential for future attempts or other nations, etc, (although I'm not too up to date on that one). Jumping the queue kind of implies that he is undeserving, and we don't know that, though?
Forum Addict 
