Brenda Brenda:
You have to register your car, your RV, you have wear a helmet on a bicycle, you cannot smoke indoors or in a Vancouver park, but everybody should be able to freely own a gun?
The logic escapes me...
The argument that x has to be registered so why not register y is not an argument for registering guns its an argument for registering
everything. You might as well say that since cars have to be registered why not register guns, knives, baseball bats, rope, blunt objects, flammable materials, people with the flu, peanuts, people with significant upper body strength, anyone whose ever taken a martial arts class, or anything else that has ever been used to kill someone. The decision to mandate registration for an object should be based on the effectiveness of such a registry and the associated costs. The gun registry just doesn't have enough benignity to justify its continued existence.
I can't speak for everyone on the pro-gun side but I'd be willing to wager a lot of us would object to at least a few items on that list. I defiantly think people should be able to smoke in a park.
Also I don't think a single person on this forum has ever suggested
everyone should be able to own a gun, just those with no criminal record or mental health issues. Which BTW is a covered by licensing, not registration.
Although I wish the outcome of this vote was different, it doesn't matter to me too much. There are bigger problems with Canada's weapon policy than the long gun registry.