CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:27 am
 


diggerdick diggerdick:
the new drinking and driving laws and the fact that you can lose your license be fined and have your car impounded by a cop with a single handheld roadside Breathalyzer is extremely frightening.

they do not have to take you back to the police station and give you a proper Breathalyzer or allow you to talk to your lawyer.

the police officers are very happy to the fact that now they have to do very little paperwork and any mistakes that they make will not be caught by either a judge or a lawyer. :|

how quick people forget, the countless cases of police misconduct and misjudgment that have caused citizens pain and even death.

But of course anything I say could not be possibly true because we all know I'm a cop hater XD


That's a good point. You should be given the option of going back to the station and doing a proper breathalyzer. Of course if you blow over the cop might be inclined to go for maximum punishment since you put him thru all that trouble.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:29 am
 


Robair Robair:
Mouthwash will set off a breathalizer 90 minutes later.


So the lesson here is don't gargle and drive?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 3448
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:35 am
 


diggerdick diggerdick:
the new drinking and driving laws and the fact that you can lose your license be fined and have your car impounded by a cop with a single handheld roadside Breathalyzer is extremely frightening.

they do not have to take you back to the police station and give you a proper Breathalyzer or allow you to talk to your lawyer.

the police officers are very happy to the fact that now they have to do very little paperwork and any mistakes that they make will not be caught by either a judge or a lawyer. :|

how quick people forget, the countless cases of police misconduct and misjudgment that have caused citizens pain and even death.

But of course anything I say could not be possibly true because we all know I'm a cop hater XD


Very good points.

I think it should be mandatory that the police have to take anyone pulled over back to the station to give you a breathalyzer no matter what the roadside breathalzyer says because it could be inaccurate and police have poor observational skills.
Paddy wagons should be on every roadsite checkstop to ferry people to the station en masse to save on gas.
personal Vehicles can be pushed into the ditch and retrieved later by tow trucks to avoid blocking the street.

Paperwork should lengthy and every form filled out should be checked over by at least two other officers to ensure the originator hasn't typed a 0 instead of an o. Suspected drunk drivers who have been brought to the station in the paddy wagon will be given acccomodations in the drunk tank until thier paperwork is inspected and approved.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:38 am
 


We don't have ditches in Vancouver. Does that mean they have to push my car all the way to Pitt Meadows or God knows where they do have ditches.

As for the rest, most people would probably still rather put up with that than lose their license and vehicle for a time.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15102
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:44 am
 


Yogi Yogi:

As far as 0 Tolerance goes, I'm all for it. If it means 'no rumballs, then so be it. Of course mouthwash will give a + reading if it contains alcohol. Use a different brand. There's lots to choose from.
So you're ok with getting a fine and losing your license for three days because you used mouthwash? I"m not.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8851
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:45 am
 


Chumley Chumley:
diggerdick diggerdick:
the new drinking and driving laws and the fact that you can lose your license be fined and have your car impounded by a cop with a single handheld roadside Breathalyzer is extremely frightening.

they do not have to take you back to the police station and give you a proper Breathalyzer or allow you to talk to your lawyer.

the police officers are very happy to the fact that now they have to do very little paperwork and any mistakes that they make will not be caught by either a judge or a lawyer. :|

how quick people forget, the countless cases of police misconduct and misjudgment that have caused citizens pain and even death.

But of course anything I say could not be possibly true because we all know I'm a cop hater XD


Very good points.

I think it should be mandatory that the police have to take anyone pulled over back to the station to give you a breathalyzer no matter what the roadside breathalzyer says because it could be inaccurate and police have poor observational skills.
Paddy wagons should be on every roadsite checkstop to ferry people to the station en masse to save on gas.
personal Vehicles can be pushed into the ditch and retrieved later by tow trucks to avoid blocking the street.

Paperwork should lengthy and every form filled out should be checked over by at least two other officers to ensure the originator hasn't typed a 0 instead of an o. Suspected drunk drivers who have been brought to the station in the paddy wagon will be given acccomodations in the drunk tank until thier paperwork is inspected and approved.



Seems to me that a taxi cab would be a helluvalotcheaper and less hassle! How could anyone possibly be against any attempts to curtail impaired driving???

Canadian Drunk Driving; DUI; DWI; Impaired Driving Law.
Topics on this page:
BC makes impaired driving laws tougher.


Impaired Driving is a Federal Criminal Offence


What are my Rights and What do I do if I am Pulled Over for Suspected Impaired Driving?


Timeline from Suspected Impaired Driving to Court Appearance


Impaired Driving Penalties


Should I retain a lawyer?








BC makes impaired driving laws tougher.
It was announced on October 18, 2004 that BC will have new tougher impaired driving laws in effect by the year end. The highlights are as follows:

Drivers with a Criminal Code drinking driving conviction will have to complete a rehabilitation program;
Drinking driving offenders with three or more conviction may have install a device that requires a breath sample before a vehicle will start;
Drivers receiving a 24-hour roadside suspension can also have their vehicles impounded for 24 hours;
If a driver disputes a 24-hour prohibition, police can use the roadside screening device as an approved breath test rather than having to conduct the test at a police station.


Impaired Driving is a Federal Criminal Offence
Section 253(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada makes it an offence to operate or have care and control of a motor vehicle, vessel, aircraft or railway equipment while your blood alcohol concentration is greater than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood. This term is often shortened to 80 mg% or .08.


Other Criminal driving offences include:

Failing to provide a breath sample,
Dangerous driving,
Failing to stop after an accident,
Criminal negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle,
Driving while prohibited,
Engaging police in a pursuit, and
all the above (where applicable) resulting in bodily harm or death.


What are my Rights and What do I do if I am Pulled Over for Suspected Impaired Driving?
You have the Right not to Incriminate yourself:

You do not have to tell the police officer how much you have had to drink or when you started or finished drinking;
You do not have to perform any sobriety test such as walking a line;
What you Must do:

You have to produce your driver's licence; vehicle registration and insurance;
If asked you must blow into blow into an Approved Screening Device (ASD).
What does the Approved Screening Device (ASD) Do?

It tests for the presence of alcohol in your body;
It is set for a "warn" at a reading of between of 50 to 100 milligrams (Note: The legal limit is 80 milligrams or .08);
It is set for a "fail" at a reading of a 100 milligrams and over (Note: The legal limit is 80 milligrams or .08).
What happens if I blow over 100 milligrams?

The police officer can suspend your drivers licence for 90 days;
The police officer can require you to attend at the police station to take a breathalyser test, which gives a more precise measure of the alcohol in your blood.
What are my Rights Regarding the Breathalyser Test?

You have the right to be told why yo're being detained at the police station;
You must be told of your right to contact a lawyer before having to give a breathalyser sample;
If you blow over .08 you'll be charged with this offence;
If you blow under .08 you still may be charged with the separate offence of impaired driving.





Timeline from Suspected Impaired Driving to Court Appearance
The following timeline is based on an uncomplicated impaired driving investigation.
(This timeline is applicable to BC and was prepared by RRID)


00:00 The suspect vehicle is sighted and pulled over.

00:02 Driver's documents have been obtained and an odour of liquor is noted on the driver's breath.

00:04 Driver is warned about being under investigation for impaired driving and the Approved Screening Device (ASD) demand is made.

00:05 Driver blows a fail on the ASD.

00:06 Driver is given the police warning and advised of his/her Charter Rights.

00:08 Breathalyzer demand is made.

00:09 24 hour suspension demand is made. Driver is placed in police vehicle for transport to the Detachment for testing.

00:25 A driving time of 15 minutes is assumed to arrive at the detachment. This estimate could be somewhat less or much more depending on the initial location.

00:27 Driver decides to contact Legal Aid for advice and an initial call is made.

00:47 An average time of 20 minutes for Legal Aid to return the initial call is assumed. The waiting time is seldom much less than this.

00:57 An average time of 10 minutes for conversation with Legal Aid is assumed. It is not usually much more or less than this.

Driver is taken to the breath testing area. Impaired drivers investigation guide is completed.

01:18 Face to face observation period to guard against mouth alcohol is completed prior to breath testing.

01:21 First breath sample is taken and analyzed. Sample over 100 mg. % is assumed for this scenario.

01:38 15 clear minutes are observed prior to test number 2. Sample over 100 mg % and within 20 mg % of the first sample is assumed. If not, a third test would be required. The driver's fingerprints and photograph are often taken in this waiting period.
Note: 1

01:41 Driver is escorted to a secure location to await preparation and service of documents. A ride home is usually arranged at this point.

01:56 Breath test technician prepares Certificate of Analysis. Investigator prepares an Administrative Driving Prohibition, a 24 hour Suspension Notice, a Promise to Appear for a court date, a Notice of Intention to Seek Greater Penalty by Reason of Previous Conviction if required.

02:00 Documents are served and the driver is released.

02:30 The investigator starts an investigation file. Details of the investigation are entered on the computer. The 3 circumstance pages of the ADP are completed and all pages faxed to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles. A criminal record and a driving record are ordered. The file is organized and submitted to the supervisor for approval.

At this point the investigator may choose to return to patrol or if the shift is over can now go home.

03:30 A report to Crown Counsel is completed in triplicate. This consists of 5 or 6 typewritten pages depending on whether the investigator includes a narrative of events. Attached to this report are photocopies of the officer's notes, all documents produced so far except the ADP and 24 hour suspension, and a check sheet showing all pages included in the submission to Crown.

The file is now forwarded to Crown Counsel for a decision on charges.


07:30 A typical court appearance by the investigator to give testimony will occupy at least half a shift. This assumes that the trial runs when scheduled and there are no adjournments.

A typical impaired driving investigation with a court appearance and no complications will easily consume 7 1/2 hours of an officer's time.

If a collision gave rise to the circumstances, long distances are involved, repeat court appearances occur and other paper work is required this time estimate can easily become double or longer.


Note: 1 - In Ontario, if the lower of the two readings is 90 mgs % or greater you will be issued a document advising you your driving privileges have been administratively suspended for 90 days. Even those who are acquitted of the charge, carry the 90-day suspension on their records for three years. This is one of the very few incidences in the English Speaking World where the cherished "Innocent until proven guilty" tenet is violated.


Impaired Driving Penalties
First time offence (over 80 mgms. of alcohol in 100 ml. of blood) carries a one-year suspension of driving privileges, and a fine of not less than $600.
Second time offence (over 80 mgms. of alcohol in 100 ml. of blood) carries a two-year suspension of driving privileges, and imprisonment for not less than 14 days.
Insurance premiums often rise dramatically, in some cases to $7,000 per year.
Also involved in a Crash - In BC, If you are convicted of impaired driving and you caused a crash, the cost of your vehicle insurance will increase. In addition, ICBC will not pay to repair or replace the vehicle. ICBC can also recover from you all costs associated with the crash.
Should I retain a lawyer?
You should seek legal advice if you are charged with impaired driving. Conviction is not automatic and there may be defences available to you to defeat the impaired driving charge. Legal fees are always a concern and may run you $2,000 to $5,000 plus expenses. Fees must be weighted against the costs of a conviction:

You may lose your job if you cannot drive;
You face a severe change in your life style if you cannot drive;
Addition Insurance premiums for up to six years;
You will have a criminal record;
In Ontario, persons convicted of drinking and driving offences must complete a remedial program at a cost of $475 plus GST before licence reinstatement.
Anyone convicted in Ontario of a drinking and driving offence, must install an ignition interlock in their vehicle once their driving privileges are restored. Before starting the car, the driver will have to blow into the device. If an impermissible level of alcohol is detected, the car will not start.
Persons convicted of a first offence have to use the device, which rents for about $100 a month, for at least one year; those convicted of a second offence can apply to have it removed after three years. A driver with more than two convictions must install the device permanently.


A criminal record could hurt your future employment and restrict your ability to travel. However, it should not prevent you from entering the United States as generally it is not a crime of moral turpitude under U.S. immigration law.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8851
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:00 am
 


RUEZ RUEZ:
Yogi Yogi:

As far as 0 Tolerance goes, I'm all for it. If it means 'no rumballs, then so be it. Of course mouthwash will give a + reading if it contains alcohol. Use a different brand. There's lots to choose from.
So you're ok with getting a fine and losing your license for three days because you used mouthwash? I"m not.



Unless you JUST GARGLED and then jumped into you vehicle, AND immediately got stopped by the Cop who just happened to be waiting around the corner for you... the argument you use is a bunch of malarky!

Active ingredients in commercial brands of mouthwash can include thymol, eucalyptol,[14] hexetidine, methyl salicylate, menthol, chlorhexidine gluconate,[12][15] benzalkonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride,[16] methylparaben, hydrogen peroxide, domiphen bromide and sometimes fluoride,[17] enzymes and calcium. Ingredients also include water, sweeteners such as sorbitol, sucralose, sodium saccharin, and xylitol (which doubles as a bacterial inhibitor).[18]

Sometimes a significant amount of alcohol (up to 27% vol) is added,[19] as a carrier for the flavor, to provide "bite".[20] Because of the alcohol content, it is possible to fail a breathalyzer test after rinsing although breath alcohol levels return to normal after 10mins; in addition, alcohol is a drying agent and may worsen chronic bad breath


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 313
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:32 am
 


what's going to end up happening,that someone with financial and political means is going to take this to court.

all the people that believe the right to a proper Breathalyzer, lawyer and a day in court can be taken away simply because a single police officer with a handheld roadside Breathalyzer says that they fail are being led down the garden path by the British Columbia government who are morally and criminally suspect themselves .......and need revenue badly.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:10 am
 


Yogi Yogi:
Why is drinking OR driving such a difficult choice for most people? [huh]

Noooooooo kidding!!!


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:28 am
 


diggerdick diggerdick:
what's going to end up happening,that someone with financial and political means is going to take this to court.

all the people that believe the right to a proper Breathalyzer, lawyer and a day in court can be taken away simply because a single police officer with a handheld roadside Breathalyzer says that they fail are being led down the garden path by the British Columbia government who are morally and criminally suspect themselves .......and need revenue badly.

Well, maybe your whiney attitude will change when some drunk driver violates WAY more than your rights after he plows into and cripples you or a loved one.
The asshole drunk that broke my back had MORE rights than I did at that moment.
Care to explain that digger? Care to explain WHY a drunk driver should have MORE rights than their victims???????
Quite frankly, the only cops I wouldn't trust in these cases are the retired cocksuckers that run or work for agencies that get drunk drivers OFF the charges.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:33 am
 


PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Quite frankly, the only cops I wouldn't trust in these cases are the retired cocksuckers that run or work for agencies that get drunk drivers OFF the charges.


How about the ones that drink and drive themselves? How about the ones that kill somebody, run home, then return and say they had a few drinks at home to steady their nerves.

I think there should be some way for people to contest this - as in being able to insist they're given a proper breathalyzer at the station. I have no problem setting the limit at .05 - many European jurisdictions do. But then make that finding subject to the same rules as now apply to .08.

If a cop thinks you're impaired for any valid reason, he should be able to impound your vehicle for 24 hours to prevent you from driving. But anything more than that and the burden of proof should rise to what it now is for .08.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 313
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:45 am
 


PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
diggerdick diggerdick:
what's going to end up happening,that someone with financial and political means is going to take this to court.

all the people that believe the right to a proper Breathalyzer, lawyer and a day in court can be taken away simply because a single police officer with a handheld roadside Breathalyzer says that they fail are being led down the garden path by the British Columbia government who are morally and criminally suspect themselves .......and need revenue badly.

Well, maybe your whiney attitude will change when some drunk driver violates WAY more than your rights after he plows into and cripples you or a loved one.
The asshole drunk that broke my back had MORE rights than I did at that moment.
Care to explain that digger? Care to explain WHY a drunk driver should have MORE rights than their victims???????
Quite frankly, the only cops I wouldn't trust in these cases are the retired cocksuckers that run or work for agencies that get drunk drivers OFF the charges.
I agree, true drunk drivers should be taken off the road immediately this new law is laying all the blame on the low end of the scale .05% alcohol. Not the habitual drunk who drinks and drives well over the legal limit and has done it for years.

If the cops couldn't get these habitual drunk drivers off the road before these new laws are not to do anything.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:53 am
 


diggerdick diggerdick:
I agree, true drunk drivers should be taken off the road immediately this new law is laying all the blame on the low end of the scale .05% alcohol. Not the habitual drunk who drinks and drives well over the legal limit and has done it for years.

If the cops couldn't get these habitual drunk drivers off the road before these new laws are not to do anything.


Not quite true. Because this new law is so easy to enforce - no worry about going to trial and being challenged, the cops will opt for using it's provisions a lot more often, so even some habitual drunks will get caught up in it and be off the road for a brief time. But it's not the best way to go.

Look at how often judges give repeat offenders meaningless sentences.

Really, as long as you don't hurt somebody, being drunk and driving isn't a problem. I would like to see harsher penalties for when you do hurt somebody. Killing somebody while drunk should be treated as second degree murder - lifetime sentence, chance of parole at 10 years or so, but you drink and drive again and you're back in the clink.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:54 am
 


Bring on the nanny state.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:01 pm
 


Ain't the Union Of Soviet Socialist Regions or what we used to call BC, grand.

When you can arbitrarily make the rules like this Government, there seems to be a strong tendency to forget about rights, due process and justice. :roll:

I guess Campbells next step will be the Black Maria's arriving in the night to pick up dissenting members of the population. Although it should be fun to see Carole James dragged away kicking and screaming and put in the back of a blacked out Grand Caravan. :lol:


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.