DerbyX DerbyX:
bootlegga bootlegga:
The point is that if people have survived this 'superbug', then they are immune and science should theoretically be able to figure out why they are now immune and develop a new batch of antibiotics to wipe this fella out too. That's how they develop the flu vaccine every year (and yes I know viruses and bacteria are different beasts), but I assume that immunologists could reverse engineer something (penicillin, amoxicillin, whatever) to be able wipe out this bastard too.
Then again, maybe not, I don't honestly know.
Actually Boots, a vaccine isn't an antibiotic. Its an attenuated (non-virulent or inactivated) version of the target bug. It lets our immune system develop its own defences.
Theoretically speaking it doesn't matter if the bug was 0% fatal or 100% fatal. It won't affect the ability to develop a treatment. The more pressing factor would be the ability to culture the bug.
I know that a vaccine and an anti-biotic are different, but I'm foolishly naive that the science that has created vaccines and anti-biotics for almost a century can develop something for NDM-1.
If not, then as Bart said, it's the end of the world!
Still, there's some hope. A Calgary newspaper (I can't remember which one I read it in) reported over the weekend, we know that the Alberta man who caught the superbug isn't an Edmonton Eskimo, because as all football fans know, Eskimos can't catch anything!
