Mustang1 Mustang1:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
I'm just shocked at a Boxhead Buick. The crappy caddy opel got nowhere a few years ago. I just don't think the demographic that buys Buicks will rush to buy one made in Germany.
GM is actually targeting young, mid-to-late 30s males who would normally gravitate towards TSXs. A Turbo is apparently on the way later this fall and so far, reviews have been quite positive.
As a Grand National owner, I've always had an interest in Buicks. I think the demographic has really changed over the past 40 years. In the 70s, Buicks were seen as, and marketed as, "Go fast in style". Buicks were seen as a stylish musclecar, especially the Skylark GSs (455 big block rocket!). In the 80s came the turbo Regals, culminating in the 1987 GN. When I was in highschool, the Grand National was the coolest car on the road. So, when I got a job and some dough, I had to have one.

Then GM canned most of their real-wheel models and Buick was instantly transformed from a cool brand to a blue-hair brand. In the early 90s, Buick showed how horrible their marketing and design departments had lost their way. They introduced a Super Charged Buick Regal. It was marketed to the "newly highly employed young guy with a family". It was a Super Charged Grand National wannabee that you could only get in a 4 door. It was a car styled for the blue-hairs with an engine for a gear-head. No one bought it.
So, Eyebrock, don't underestimate the Buick demographic. We're still out there; Buick just hasn't turned out a car for us in 25 years. And Mustang, it'll take more than a turbocharger to turn the traditional Buick-guy back to the brand. They tried that before and it flopped. The engine needs to be paired with a cool design. If this car is a redesigned, retro-styled Skylark or Regal (similar to the way Dodge redesigned their Challenger, Ford did the Mustang and GM has already done with the Camaro) then there's a chance for a lot of interest in Buick. I'd buy a 2011 Grand National, if such a car existed.