[GreenTiger]

andyt andyt:

raydan raydan:

Was Michael Jackson racist because he lightened his skin color?

No. but because he only had sex with white boys.

There was a fake song made up a the time with Michael Jackson singing "Thank Heaven for Little Boys" that Don Imus played when he was coked up in NY.(for those of us who think he is guilty).

[Brenda]

Oh, absolutely. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, it was all hearsay. It could be bogus, like a lot of shit has been bogus. And since I believe in the good of people, I believe he was innocent. But, we will never know for sure.

Methinks that if you were as popular and as rich as he was, you would have taken the same steps.

[wildrosegirl]

[Proculation]

GreenTiger GreenTiger:

. but because he only had sex with white boys.

There's nothing funny about child abuse.[/quote]
Nor has it been proven or did he have his kids taken away from him.[/quote]


Your Right Brenda,


It wasn't proven because Mikeel Jackson (He bacame a Muslim) paid a fortune to the boys and the boys parents to shut up about his perversion, with no one to testify it made it hard to prove. Once again Hollywood justice prevails.

That is my opinion, your opinion is equally valid and may even be right. It Ultimately comes down to everyone has their own opinion about whether Michael did or didn't do it.[/quote]
The dad of Jordon Chandler admitted he invented the story to extort money from MJ. And he never became muslim. That's Cat Stevens.

[GreenTiger]

Brenda Brenda:

Oh, absolutely. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, it was all hearsay. It could be bogus, like a lot of shit has been bogus. And since I believe in the good of people, I believe he was innocent. But, we will never know for sure.

Methinks that if you were as popular and as rich as he was, you would have taken the same steps.

I believe in the good of people as well and would have thought of the parents of the kids as chiselers, but the police had a [pretty fair amount amount of physical evidence that would not exist if he was just "child friendly", but hey as I said it all comes down to what you want to believe and you are innocent until proven guilty.

[ShepherdsDog]

Brenda Brenda:

Oh, absolutely. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, it was all hearsay. It could be bogus, like a lot of shit has been bogus. And since I believe in the good of people, I believe he was innocent. But, we will never know for sure.

Methinks that if you were as popular and as rich as he was, you would have taken the same steps.

Are you a good Catholic??

[Brenda]

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

[Brenda]

Proculation Proculation:

GreenTiger GreenTiger:

.

Your Right Brenda,


It wasn't proven because Mikeel Jackson (He bacame a Muslim) paid a fortune to the boys and the boys parents to shut up about his perversion, with no one to testify it made it hard to prove. Once again Hollywood justice prevails.

That is my opinion, your opinion is equally valid and may even be right. It Ultimately comes down to everyone has their own opinion about whether Michael did or didn't do it.

The dad of Jordon Chandler admitted he invented the story to extort money from MJ. And he never became muslim. That's Cat Stevens.

You're right.

[Dragom]

Micheal Jackson was accused of giving a hand job to a kid. Now I personally can think of a dozen memories between ages 8 and 12 that trading in for a memory of getting hand job from a pop star would be a significant improvement.

Second the family that accused had tried to get money out of other celebrities before.

Third do this skin whitening products whiten skin or would they help accentuate my zombie-like translucence?

[ShepherdsDog]

Brenda Brenda:

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

it was obviously over the top of your head, so I'll make it simpler. Many Catholics think that it was impossible for priests to be molesters because they were 'good' people. It has nothing to do with atheism vs. religion. Sorry to remove a reason for you to feel indignant.

[Proculation]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Brenda Brenda:

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

it was obviously over the top of your head, so I'll make it simpler. Many Catholics think that it was impossible for priests to be molesters because they were 'good' people. It has nothing to do with atheism vs. religion. Sorry to remove a reason for you to feel indignant.

I'm catholic and I don't think that at all

And I don't know anyone who thinks that way.

[Brenda]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Brenda Brenda:

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

it was obviously over the top of your head, so I'll make it simpler. Many Catholics think that it was impossible for priests to be molesters because they were 'good' people. It has nothing to do with atheism vs. religion. Sorry to remove a reason for you to feel indignant.

Do you always have to be a pompous ass?

[ShepherdsDog]

Brenda Brenda:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Brenda Brenda:

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

it was obviously over the top of your head, so I'll make it simpler. Many Catholics think that it was impossible for priests to be molesters because they were 'good' people. It has nothing to do with atheism vs. religion. Sorry to remove a reason for you to feel indignant.

Do you always have to be a pompous ass?

[kenmore]

Whats the difference between all those people who fry their skin to look tall,dark and handsome?/// unless we are talking about anal bleaching which we are not lol..

[kenmore]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Brenda Brenda:

Do I have to be religious to have morals and to believe in the good of people?

Oh wait, that is what only the bible preaches, and what an Atheist with common sense cannot come up with themselves, right?

it was obviously over the top of your head, so I'll make it simpler. Many Catholics think that it was impossible for priests to be molesters because they were 'good' people. It has nothing to do with atheism vs. religion. Sorry to remove a reason for you to feel indignant.

And just as many Catholics think that it is just as thinkable for priests to be child molesters because they are after all human. Sometimes we have great expectations for them and other clergy because they are held in high regard. That is because they preach the gospel of Christ. But alas as humans they smoke, drink, and have both hetero and homosexual sex and some are pedophiles and drug users.
Watch poron and masterbate,, go to bars and stip joints. It is our unrealistic view of them and their job that stands in the way of a realist perception of the clergy.