Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
Or, we could all agree to stop being clowns and perhaps neither give such misinformation.
Maybe I'm just too foolishly hopeful for such a thing.
I don't think you're foolish. I just think if you want peace then you're better served by diplomacy than "missions" concocted by a school yard of 'nations' who are simply vying for whatever they can get for themselves in the guise of "doing what's right". If the UN ever had a chance at doing something right they would've done it in Rwanda. The UN served the peacekeeping role well during the cold war but in most instances, imo, it wont work.
The underlying reason why most people are cynical of peacekeeping missions is that at the end of the day peace is either done through talking or fighting. The reason people are hopeful for peacekeeping is precisely because it presents that illusional third choice that doesn't really exist...mostly because it doesn't really work. It's not the first time it's been tried either.
The very look of a blue helmet is an oxymoron. Iterally in cases, it's like a rifle without a bullet. A carrot and stick without the carrot.