Hitler_Elvis Hitler_Elvis:
Perhaps you have a problem with comprehension? Where does it say "holocaust denial?"
I suspect this conference dealt with the issue of the holocaust becoming an industry.
I have a problem with "comprehension"? Project away, denier. Perhaps you could explain (and when you hedge your ignorance with "I suspect" it only illustrates how little you know) how topics that included denying Treblinka's role in the Holocaust and providing a forum for cranks like Faurisson isn't revisionism?
$1:
Jewish Professor Norman G. Finkelstein, (banned from tenure at Harvard due to some wealthy, powerful Jews) who argues that the
American Jewish establishment exploits the memory of the Nazi Holocaust for political and financial gain, as well as to further the interests of Israel. According to Finkelstein, this "Holocaust industry" has corrupted Jewish culture and the authentic memory of the Holocaust. Finkelstein's parents were both Holocaust survivors who had been inmates of concentration camps.
The book was a bestseller in Europe, the Middle East and the Americas, and has been translated into 16 languages.
You can read Finkelstein here:
THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY: REFLECTIONS ON THE EXPLOITATION OF JEWISH SUFFERING (Second Edition)
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/content.php?pg=3There's a certain irony in the children of Warsaw, perpetuating their own genocide, albeit a glacially slow one, over another people. Maybe Israeli's are just more patient?
There wasn't one legitimate Holocaust scholar at the Conference in Iran. I wonder why? It wasn't serious discourse or historical inquiry because there isn't any to be found in Holocaust revisionism.
Your buddy Ahmadinejad is a denier and you've done squat to prove otherwise. Instead of playing the role of apologist, why not demonstrate how the conference wasn't a denier dumbfest. If not, take your goose-stepping circus back to Stormfront where it belongs