PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Yeah just like the Toweliban follow the rules by using IEDs (could'a SWORN there was a moratorium and ban on landmines) and refusing to try and separate themselves in appearance from the average Afghani. Now that's my personal feelings out of the way.
We aren't them. Any attempt to claim that because the do it we can to just means we are as bad as them.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
First off. The man was just involved in ambush with an unknown number of unfriendlies headed their way. Not a good position to be in to pratice field medicine on the enemy.
We prosecuted enemy soldiers for doing just what this soldier did. In fact we prosecuted enemy soldiers for doing what we now endorse but thats another story. So far the story is that this was an after action execution on a wounded soldier who was disarmed and medically assessed. I have no doubt had this been a story about what they did to our guys the response would have been very different.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Secondly, you are presuming to speak to for the average Afghani. The man shot was Taliban. I don't think too many Afghanis are gonna lose any sleep over it, especially if it's an isolated incident.
Mind you I'm just as guilty as you now for presuming how the average Afghani will feel

I don't think so. These are the people that have openly said they want the Taliban to play some part in their future and have chanted
"death to Canada"I have no doubt that anything we do can't be used against us somehow.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Third, people need to grow the fuck up and realize this happens. It happened in WW1, it happened in WW2, it happened in Korea and it'll keep happening.
Hence we don't get to decide to invade a country on the pretense of helping them without their permission then tell them to suck it up when we kill them doing it.
Their country, their rules and when they chant "death to Canada" because we kill them by accident then they are right regardless of circumstances.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
4th, if this had been a police officer and gravely wounded bank robber, the cop wouldn't be worryin' about a few dozen to a hundred or so of his buddies heading that way and loaded for bear.
Again, according to the facts presented this was an execution of a wounded prisoner who presented no threat and no immediate threat existed. If he is claiming a humanitarian act then he can't claim self defense can he.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
5th, again, no one has the right to judge his actions except other combat soldiers. Huggy feelings and rules get you killed when the other side don't believe in either.
Yes we do. If you truly think that then we have no right to judge muslim actions and only fellow muslims may do that.
Do you agree with that?