Choban Choban:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
He says there was a cavity search, the Criminal Court didn't find his evidence credible.
And on cavity searches, never done one mate, never needed to and I can't see why one was done.
You believe the lawyer with an agenda who lost at court over the cops.
Me, I'll wait to see what happens at the Court of Appeal. The rush to judge is the easy route.
And trust me, Toronto cops are busy enough.
All the court said was the evidence of sexuall assault wasn't credible, not that a cavity search wasn't done.
Never had the experience myself but I'd do the same in his situation, no leagal basis for the search (ie. possesion of drugs, suspected dealing ect), I'm sure it's not common practice to cavity search someone going into the drunk tank. So in this case he may have a case, though I will agree to you that there is the possability that he's just another lawyer with an agenda. we will have to await the final verdict.
Court speak. "Not credible" = "we don't believe you."
And this guy is a criminal lawyer. That should tell you a lot.
There was no cavity search. He may have had to drop his pants but that 'ain't a cavity search.
This guy is just stretching facts, or as we normal people would say, lying.