[ridenrain]

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

ridenrain ridenrain:

How damned "progressive and liberal" are we when we can let a disabled man in a wheelchair become homeless.

What an odd statement, since it's always the left-wingers who are first to
demand help for the poor, not right-wingers. You act as if we don't care?

And many homeless people are disabled, mentally and/or physically.

Funny, some of the most effective groups down there are religious groups who do much of their work from donations and not government money. I'd question that many of the folks soaking up much of that free money are poverty pimps and much of the problem.

Wasn't it the rampant concern for his rights that prevented these folks from living on the streets before? Didn't the charter and it's focus on rights make the province open up their wards and let these people out?

[martin14]

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

It didn't answer my question anyway. How does Liberal/Left-Wing policies make it
more possible for the handicapped to become homeless?

I don't remember seeing that in their mission statement.

big secret coming... the Left / Democrat / Socialist / Liberal
tend to be favored by the lower/ working classes,
and those who think government should do everything for the people.

If you took those people and raised them to the point where they started
having money, they would realize that they did it in spite of the
government in power, and would vote for smaller government and less taxes,
and more responsibility to the people, cause people solve problems,
not governments.

So, (a) the Left is intent on keeping people poor, cause if they
didnt, they would lose their power base.




A community used to take care of its own; disabled, unemployed,
homeless, whatever. An individual also has responsibilities TO the community..
to work, care for kids or old people, or whatever they could contribute.
That responsibility has been stripped away year by year by big government,
who people vote for so they can not care about others in the community.

(b) the Left cares less about people than the Right does.


Because this guy is in the hands of a government that doesnt care about him,
people around him dont care because well, the government is doing it...
right

So he ends up homeless, and all those 'bleeding hearts' will raise a
stink about it and criticize everyone but themselves for it,
but in reality when its time for this guy to come into their homes,
the lights are off.

And now he is dead brought to you by a government that doesnt care,
and a community that thinks they dont need to do anything anymore,
thanks to big government that does everything for the people.


So put that in ur pipe and smoke it from a while,
see what you come up with

[ridenrain]

Looks like even ther czar jams out.
The Scott mission in Toronto did it's usual thanksgiving dinner and burried deep in the middle of the article, we read:

$1:

The steaming plates of food were devoured quickly after volunteers distributed them throughout the packed dining hall. Federal Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff was to have helped serve, but Smith said he came down with the flu on Saturday and had to skip the dinner.

I do hope the czar gets over his flue soon.

http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/617483

[DerbyX]

An large majority of the people in professions like the health care and education are self-described left wingers/liberals.

One group is dedicated to helping people and the other dedicated to educating people so they may make a better life for themselves.

In others words your analysis is completely wrong.

[ShepherdsDog]

Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

The truth of the matter is, that those you choose to vilify all of the time ....those evil right wing Americans, give more to charity than any other people on the planet. The left tends to assume it's the governments job to help the less fortunate, and that the government is. That way many don't feel obliged to help out.

I have no idea if that's an unfinished sentence or not... Maybe I read it wrong.

It didn't answer my question anyway. How does Liberal/Left-Wing policies make it
more possible for the handicapped to become homeless?

I don't remember seeing that in their mission statement.

It's not incomplete, it's a statement of fact. They[the Left] believe it's the gov't's job and that the government is in fact doing said job. Sorry if it was a bit awkward to read.

[uwish]

ridenrain ridenrain:

How damned "progressive and liberal" are we when we can let a disabled man in a wheelchair become homeless.

While I tend to agree with the comment in general, I don't buy the idea that just because someone is differently able they should get a free ride. Many homeless people have made poor decisions and are either suffering from addiction or their plight is temporary.

The vast majority of homeless are homeless because of their choices, not because of 'big bad society'

[uwish]

DerbyX DerbyX:

An large majority of the people in professions like the health care and education are self-described left wingers/liberals.

One group is dedicated to helping people and the other dedicated to educating people so they may make a better life for themselves.

In others words your analysis is completely wrong.

but your analysis of claiming a large majority of people in health care are liberals is completely not wrong at all is it?

[DerbyX]

No it isn't. Note the lower case l. I'm not ascribing them to a political party but rather a philosophy. Seeing as we never seem to here people complain when the right wingers claim that the majority of the military are good ole right wing conservative boys do they.

[TattoodGirl]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

TattoodGirl TattoodGirl:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

once all Canadians are taken care of, then I'm all for helping out others.

Once you come back to Canada and help out your fellow Canadians you dont have much to say.

I still pay Canadian taxes on property and investments, and contribute a few grand (plus food)a year to Harvest for Humanity and the Make a Wish Foundation, so I guess I'm entitled to say what I want and as often as I want to............you Canucks fan


I was going to call you an insufferable bitch, but I wanted to a word that was really able to convey a real derogatory message - including loose morality, low intelligence and questionable genetics.

[stokes]

DerbyX DerbyX:

No it isn't. Note the lower case l. I'm not ascribing them to a political party but rather a philosophy. Seeing as we never seem to here people complain when the right wingers claim that the majority of the military are good ole right wing conservative boys do they.

I resemble that remark

[Streaker]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

I was going to call you an insufferable bitch, but I wanted to a word that was really able to convey a real derogatory message - including loose morality, low intelligence and questionable genetics.

Man, how low can you go?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't this kind of blatant racism no longer allowed at CKA?

[Streaker]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

The truth of the matter is, that those you choose to vilify all of the time ....those evil right wing Americans, give more to charity than any other people on the planet. The left tends to assume it's the governments job to help the less fortunate and that the government is. That way many don't feel obliged to help out.

Judging by the results, I'd say that that reliance on voluntary donations to charity comes up short in the US.

[martin14]

Streaker Streaker:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

The truth of the matter is, that those you choose to vilify all of the time ....those evil right wing Americans, give more to charity than any other people on the planet. The left tends to assume it's the governments job to help the less fortunate and that the government is. That way many don't feel obliged to help out.

Judging by the results, I'd say that that reliance on voluntary donations to charity comes up short in the US.

Yup, maybe the lefties should off their lazy asses and
kick in something instead of 'more government'

[Streaker]

martin14 martin14:

Streaker Streaker:

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

The truth of the matter is, that those you choose to vilify all of the time ....those evil right wing Americans, give more to charity than any other people on the planet. The left tends to assume it's the governments job to help the less fortunate and that the government is. That way many don't feel obliged to help out.

Judging by the results, I'd say that that reliance on voluntary donations to charity comes up short in the US.

Yup, maybe the lefties should off their lazy asses and
kick in something instead of 'more government'

Because things are just so peachy in the USA?

[danimal]

How low can you go?