CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3329
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:38 pm
 


I thought the "Nation of Islam" was a radical Muslim group in the US. Also, this seems like a waste of space. It goes without saying that disagreement with Obama does not imply racism. If someone did say such, they would be a moron and should wear one of those fancy dunce caps.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:49 pm
 


These sorts of things all seem kind of ironic considering that it was American ultra-rightists who kept accusing anyone (including fellow American conservatives) of out-and-out treason if they disagreed with anything Dubya did. After an imploded economy, two quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a destroyed Republican party that was deliberately murdered by rabid ideologues, it seems to me that some more "treason" against Bush's Three Stooges-esque administration should have been seen instead as the duty of every American patriot and would have left the United States far better off than it is today.

Let me know when the ridiculous accusations against Obama aren't being made by the usual collection of villains and I might start taking criticism of him seriously. Until that happens though they can all just fuck off.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7835
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:08 pm
 


RUEZ RUEZ:
SigPig SigPig:

Tell that to the Jews.
Ok. Can you point some out? Jews aside, you mentioned Islam and Christianity and those two religions are not bound by race, but you just called him a racist. You'll need to be more specific.


Actually... There are two major races of Jews. The Separdic Jewish population is the Arabic Jewish group, while the Ashkenazic Jews are the ones we more commonly see, since they're more stemming from Europe.

Like it or not, the perception that Judaism is bound by a particular race is false, and is probably one of the myths carried out for a long time. If you want an example, a major movement of Jews from India to Israel occurred rather recently, and they weren't the white ones you are probably used to.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15102
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:14 pm
 


commanderkai commanderkai:
RUEZ RUEZ:
SigPig SigPig:

Tell that to the Jews.
Ok. Can you point some out? Jews aside, you mentioned Islam and Christianity and those two religions are not bound by race, but you just called him a racist. You'll need to be more specific.


Actually... There are two major races of Jews. The Separdic Jewish population is the Arabic Jewish group, while the Ashkenazic Jews are the ones we more commonly see, since they're more stemming from Europe.

Like it or not, the perception that Judaism is bound by a particular race is false, and is probably one of the myths carried out for a long time. If you want an example, a major movement of Jews from India to Israel occurred rather recently, and they weren't the white ones you are probably used to.

And you quoted me because?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7835
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:26 pm
 


RUEZ RUEZ:
commanderkai commanderkai:

Actually... There are two major races of Jews. The Separdic Jewish population is the Arabic Jewish group, while the Ashkenazic Jews are the ones we more commonly see, since they're more stemming from Europe.

Like it or not, the perception that Judaism is bound by a particular race is false, and is probably one of the myths carried out for a long time. If you want an example, a major movement of Jews from India to Israel occurred rather recently, and they weren't the white ones you are probably used to.

And you quoted me because?


To support your statement about religions not having any race boundaries.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2398
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:30 am
 


SigPig SigPig:
RUEZ RUEZ:
SigPig SigPig:
Couldn't agree more. Your other two articles that attempt to point all the faults and terrible aspects of Islam while ignoring the past of Christianity on the other hand do make you a racist.

[huh] Religion isn't bound by race.


Tell that to the Jews.


Or the Hindus.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:27 pm
 


Regarding the article it doesn't suprise me in the least that she was called a racist. I really thought if or when he was elected that racism would decrease but having the first black president has made people racism crazy. Not that there are more racists since then, although there has been many people who were over dramatic about his election but there are tons of people who will play our the racism card or call anybody a racist no matter the remark or what it meant.

I mean when he was running for president in his campaign there was a ton of comments like "Why aren't you voting for Obama, because hes black"? or if anybody who voted for McCain would deemed a racist because they wern't voting for Obama who happened to be black.

So much over-dramtic racist card reactions from people during the electing and after it. It's quite pathetic. Hes the president of America and Americans have the right to critisize his actions and his way of doing things. Bush was the most hated president is a long time if not in American history. He was critisized in almost every action he took and every speech he gave. Obama has got it lucky considering because most people are afraid to speak out about his flaws without the over dratic Obama supporters slamming on them and continously playing the racist card. Which if you are in a media position that depends on popularity for views like Stephen Colbertor John Stewert, etc. That could be a really bad thing.

As for Donny_Brasco, yes it has only been a short time but everyday is a day he is suppose to be working when he is taking trips still to comedy shows and all that other bullshit. He has been critisized for that and his in-experience is showing a little bit which creates doubt with some people.

With Bush, everybody critisized him and nobody spared him. Soon after he was elected his popularity fell a lot which it wasn't that high to begin with. The only reason Bush was accepted for so long was because of 9/11. People were shocked and were scared. Because of that they looked to Bush for leadership and followed his words without question.

After the shock started to wear off, people started to ask questions specificly when war started. Shortly after people than started to critisize his leadership abilities and his choice of actions and ever since than his popularity only fell more and more and was critisized more and more. Why should Obama be any different?


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Previous  1  2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.