$1:
DerbyX:
I think they might if the proper words were spoken.
How did we end up in between the turks and greeks in cyprus anyway?
UN buffering zones to keep the peace might just work very well. Peacekeepers helping the palestinians maintain order, build infrastructure, etc stand a far better chance of anything else doing so.
Sorry Derby, but for someone who claims to be from a military background, that comment displays an astounding level of ignorance with regard to the role of peacekeepers and their duties.
Firstly, the proper term is "Buffer Zone", not "Buffering Zone". And yes, Canadians did perform an important role in Cyprus from 1964 to 1990.
But peacekeepers, in the commonly understood, Cold-War role, that Canadians have come to nostaligize, only took up their duties with the negotiated consent of the warring parties. In essence, they were only sent in once the belligerents had enjoyed their fill of war and wanted a neutral third party to help them achieve peace. There's no such consensus in Gaza, or anywhere in the Middle East for that matter.
For you to suggest that Canadians, through their tendency towards "compromise", could somehow, unilaterally, impose peace upon the region is laughable.
DerbyX DerbyX:
They do. Few listen. Without having to repost alot of graphic footage of innocent palestinians being executed by IDF/Israeli police rest assured it does happen.
Nonsense. The Israeli Defence Force is certainly not above criticism. They've done wrong from time to time.
But I challenge you to post one picture, photo, or graphic of an IDF member summarily "executing" (your words) a civillian, POW or non-combatant. You will never find it. And if you did, I can assure you, the soldier who commits the atrocity will be subject to disciplinary action.
Love the Israelis or hate them, they do indeed subject themselves to the laws of war, unlike their opponents.