CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:11 am
 


lily lily:

I was going to post that!


Excellent post, Derby.


3 times now. 8O Should I start checking my house for hidden cameras? :P





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:11 am
 


kenmore kenmore:
Wonder who's speech he stole this time?







PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:12 am
 


mtbr mtbr:
Post the letters side by side and show us where Harper formed a COALITION with a specific length of time and details about a cabinet set up.

I dare you to.


still waiting


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23091
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:13 am
 


Velcro Velcro:
whats the point of having an election, if the other parties are gonna cry and make a coalition against the party that most canadians voted for. this coalition kinda sounds like a form of genocide


I didn't realize 38% of the population was a majority...slightly less than the coalition government (Lib - 26% and NDP - 18%). I may not agree with it either, but the coalition does represent a million more voters than the current Conservative government does.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7580
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:13 am
 


Shouldn't you torys be in bible school? or are you busy searching the web for a speech for harper..lol... I wonder how he will address the "Great Nation of Quebec"?
now that he has ignited the separatist flame again..





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:15 am
 


mtbr mtbr:
mtbr mtbr:
Post the letters side by side and show us where Harper formed a COALITION with a specific length of time and details about a cabinet set up.

I dare you to.


still waiting





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:18 am
 


lily lily:
mtbr mtbr:
mtbr mtbr:
Post the letters side by side and show us where Harper formed a COALITION with a specific length of time and details about a cabinet set up.

I dare you to.


still waiting

Already addressed in Derby's excellent post above... which I'd have posted myself if I'd found it. :D


no he didn't

post the letters so we can see word for word the difference.

the left wing media keeps bringing it up but refuses to show the full contents of Harper's letter.





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:20 am
 


lily lily:
He tried and he failed.

Scape has posted the letter Harper wrote to the GG. Perhaps you've missed it.


I have read both letters and they are not the same.

I see Derby is not up to the challenge typical.. HACK :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:33 am
 


http://www.bloc-harper.com/blocharper/comletter.htm

$1:
To date (subject to the aforesaid court review) Mr. Harper has been able to lead what is called The Conservative Party of Canada and to act as Leader of the Opposition in the House of Commons.

Now, working with The Bloc Québécois, he is threatening an election.

Some say Mr. Harper has a hidden agenda.

http://www.bloc-harper.com/blocharper/blocteam.htm

I disagree.

He has a very clear agenda.

For some reason however, most people, including mainline media, do not want to believe Mr. Harper means what he says.

Here are the facts.

He has two masters. The National Citizen’s Coalition of some 40,000 members
and he has what is often referred to as The Calgary School including his confident,
Tom Flanagan and Ted Morton.

Speaking to a meeting of the National Citizen’s Coalition in Hamilton on May 24th, 1994, Mr. Harper said “Whether Canada ends up as one national government or two national governments or several national governments, or some other kind of arrangement is, quite frankly, secondary in my opinion”.

That was the year before the 1995 Separatist Referendum in Quebec and he was an M.P. at the time.

Later in the speech he said “whether Canada ends up with one national government or two governments or ten governments, the Canadian people will require less government no matter what the constitutional status or arrangements of any future country may be”.

I write to you as you have experienced his tactics during his coup of the Progressive Conservative Party.

In his mind that was a necessary step to achieve his ultimate objective. He will stop at nothing.

In 1997, he and his confident Tom Flanagan, in their Next City magazine, suggested coalitions were the only route to Conservatives seizing national power. They suggested an alliance with The Bloc Québécois “would not be out of place. The Bloc are nationalist for much the same reason that Albertans are populist - they care about their local identity……..and they see the Federal Government as a threat to their way of life,” they stated.

In 2001, Harper was the Leader of a group who proposed “a firewall around Alberta”. I can e-mail you a copy of this “Alberta Agenda” or you can pull it up on The National Citizens Coalition web page.

In October 2004, Harper made his “Belgian waffle” speech in Québec City where he suggested Canada should become a North American version of Belgium which has multiple factions each with their own autonomy. In short he felt this “national autonomy” status should be considered sympathetically because “Québécois never wanted to be an overwhelmed province in a centralized Canada”.





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:35 am
 


Still no letter....


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7580
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:36 am
 


Harpers speech should go some thing like : Good evening my cerfs.. The Queen (Laureen) and I demand you keep me on the throne. I know I have no plan and many of you are out of work. But spring is comming and you might be able to find work cutting the grass here at our palace on Sussex drive. I know I have done dick all since being crowned and I wont have george dubya to give me ideas. But please be stupid enough to keep me in power. Because so many of you (esp in Ontario ) will be on welfare I promise to give 1 cent of every dollar I steal from you back to welfare Canada..





PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 11:43 am
 


:lol:


Attachments:
mini dog bone.jpg
mini dog bone.jpg [ 1.7 KiB | Viewed 371 times ]
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 69
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:05 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
Velcro Velcro:
whats the point of having an election, if the other parties are gonna cry and make a coalition against the party that most canadians voted for. this coalition kinda sounds like a form of genocide


I didn't realize 38% of the population was a majority...slightly less than the coalition government (Lib - 26% and NDP - 18%). I may not agree with it either, but the coalition does represent a million more voters than the current Conservative government does.


you cant add the numbers of the individual parties together and say that its more than the tories. the coalition is a new party forming, so then they need new voters. how many Liberal and NDP voters still want to vote for a party that involves the sepratists


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9895
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:18 pm
 


Velcro Velcro:
bootlegga bootlegga:
Velcro Velcro:
whats the point of having an election, if the other parties are gonna cry and make a coalition against the party that most canadians voted for. this coalition kinda sounds like a form of genocide


I didn't realize 38% of the population was a majority...slightly less than the coalition government (Lib - 26% and NDP - 18%). I may not agree with it either, but the coalition does represent a million more voters than the current Conservative government does.


you cant add the numbers of the individual parties together and say that its more than the tories. the coalition is a new party forming, so then they need new voters. how many Liberal and NDP voters still want to vote for a party that involves the sepratists


If an election were held with a Liberal-NDP coalition, they wouldn't need the Bloc, they would easily beat the Conservatives. The Liberals loose many seats due to the vote split with the NDP and Greens.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:23 pm
 


High treason is fun.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5 ... 8  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.