$1:
If it's not good enough for you, then be prepared to shell out more in taxes. The federal government only provides about 3% of Olympic athletes funding. Other countries provide far more, from 10% (USA) to 80% (China). Do the math...
OK...let's do the math using YOUR numbers..you say :
90% of US Olympic athlete funding is NON-governmental
97% of Canadian Olympic funding is NON-governmental
...in other words, government funding plays almost no part
in the success of USA's athletes.
Chinese government funding is 80% compared to USA government's 10%...
therefore, using your rationale, China should be WAY more successful
than the USA, because that's how you say Canada's athletes will be way more successful....more government spending....but China isn't way more successful.
So far [Friday night] the USA has 46 medals, China 41. Do yet more math.
$1:
So do the math. We can spend $250 million a year (like the Aussies) for 50 medals or $20 million for 10-15 medals. Which do you want?
I don't much like that math...spending about 12 times as much from now on,
to win MAYBE 3-4 times the medals...someday, like in 12-16 years ?
Sounds like Bruce McNall / J.P.Ferguson Jr. / J.P. Ricciardi / Conrad Black
math..."someone else's money, results not my fault" math. Bad math.