|  | 
				  
										
					
	
			
			| Author | Topic Options |  
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  12283
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:46 pm				  
				 Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Another sellout of Canadian sovereignty by the CPC. What a surprise.   How is that selling out? Was America selling out when we sent firefighters to the WTC or when we sent troops to New Orleans? Fuck no. You're such a fucking douchebag.If we're going to rely on the US military to manage situations within our borders then Canadian sovereignty is compromised, never mind that American forces wouldn't even be under Canadian command. Pretty easy stuff to understand, really.Just like Canadian forces heading down the the states would be under Canadian command, not American. Also, if fucknuts like you weren't so anti-military, we wouldn't need America's help in defending our own borders.Now, now. Simmer down there, son.
 1- Whose command Canadian troops in the USA are under is irrelevant. It is fundamentally undesirable to have US soldiers in Canada. 
 2- I'm all for boosting the Canadian military's ability to monitor/protect our sovereignty. I think I've gone on record about that enough times. Unfortunately, the Canadian military establishment prefers to waste a pile of money fighting 'merkun wars instead of defending Canadian sovereignty. |  
		
		| 
			
			
			
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:52 pm				  
				 Streaker Streaker: 1- Whose command Canadian troops in the USA are under is irrelevant. It is fundamentally undesirable to have US soldiers in Canada. Yes it is relevant. You think that have US soldiers in Canada helping out is compromising our Sovereignty. It isn't, and you're an idiot for thinking so. And why is that undesirable? I'd welcome them with open arms.  $1: 2- I'm all for boosting the Canadian military's ability to monitor/protect our sovereignty. I think I've gone on record about that enough times. Unfortunately, the Canadian military establishment prefers to waste a pile of money fighting 'merkun wars instead of defending Canadian sovereignty. Of course. Always comes back to America. One trick pony much? Fucking broken record. |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  42160
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:55 pm				  
				 Streaker Streaker: Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Another sellout of Canadian sovereignty by the CPC. What a surprise.   How is that selling out? Was America selling out when we sent firefighters to the WTC or when we sent troops to New Orleans? Fuck no. You're such a fucking douchebag.If we're going to rely on the US military to manage situations within our borders then Canadian sovereignty is compromised, never mind that American forces wouldn't even be under Canadian command. Pretty easy stuff to understand, really.Just like Canadian forces heading down the the states would be under Canadian command, not American. Also, if fucknuts like you weren't so anti-military, we wouldn't need America's help in defending our own borders.Now, now. Simmer down there, son. 1- Whose command Canadian troops in the USA are under is irrelevant. It is fundamentally undesirable to have US soldiers in Canada.  2- I'm all for boosting the Canadian military's ability to monitor/protect our sovereignty. I think I've gone on record about that enough times. Unfortunately, the Canadian military establishment prefers to waste a pile of money fighting 'merkun wars instead of defending Canadian sovereignty .And who is in the immediate vicinity threatening Canadian sovereignty, besides a few Quebecois? |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  12283
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 8:59 pm				  
				 ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: Streaker Streaker: Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Tricks Tricks: Streaker Streaker: Another sellout of Canadian sovereignty by the CPC. What a surprise.   How is that selling out? Was America selling out when we sent firefighters to the WTC or when we sent troops to New Orleans? Fuck no. You're such a fucking douchebag.If we're going to rely on the US military to manage situations within our borders then Canadian sovereignty is compromised, never mind that American forces wouldn't even be under Canadian command. Pretty easy stuff to understand, really.Just like Canadian forces heading down the the states would be under Canadian command, not American. Also, if fucknuts like you weren't so anti-military, we wouldn't need America's help in defending our own borders.Now, now. Simmer down there, son. 1- Whose command Canadian troops in the USA are under is irrelevant. It is fundamentally undesirable to have US soldiers in Canada.  2- I'm all for boosting the Canadian military's ability to monitor/protect our sovereignty. I think I've gone on record about that enough times. Unfortunately, the Canadian military establishment prefers to waste a pile of money fighting 'merkun wars instead of defending Canadian sovereignty .And who is in the immediate vicinity threatening Canadian sovereignty, besides a few Quebecois?The CPC, for one.    |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  11108
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:05 pm				  
				 It would have been good for this to have been in place when the Red River flooded. |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  3915
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:11 pm				  
				 No one in Halifax complained in 1917 when Americans came north to aid us after the famed Halifax explosion... 
 It is truly revolting all the anti-American sentiment from my fellow Canadians... Is this a sign of the new liberal facism in Canada? I think so...
 |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  42160
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:11 pm				  
				 As I recall it was Grand Forks that burned, not Winnipeg. |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					sasquatch2
					CKA Super Elite					
					   
																	 
					 Posts:  5737
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:14 pm				  
				 US National Guard in the GTA for a snow-storm----that's what LIBRONOs think troops are for........ |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					philowl
					Junior Member					
					   
																	 
					 Posts:  62
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:18 pm				  
				 "Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other's borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal."
Harper is finishing Mulroney's job of selling out Canada to the U.S. Can anyone recall the "by invitation only: Alberta meeting with Vice-president Dick Cheney with Mike Harris, Raloh Klein, Day, Harper, and the other neo cons?  Now the u.s. military has the legal right to take military possession of Canada in an emergency, such as "protection" of Canada's oil reserves.  The largest single consumer of oil in the world is the Pentagon.  Remember, Mulroney introduced Harper as the candidate for the Conservative leadership.  Harper lost, but during the following week Mckay mysteriously changed his mind and switched his support to Harper.  Harper was not publicly elected; he got the leadership by some backroom deal.  One of his first actions was to sign a little publicized deal with the Pentagon.  Wake up, Canada! Before it's too late.
 |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  4914
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:20 pm				  
				 There are currently 3500 CF troop in Texas training for desert missions such as Afgan.
 R U upset about that? GUESS WHAT THEY ARE UNDER CANADIAN COMMAND ALSO! the horror!
 
 grow up!
 |  
		
		| 
			
			
			
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:22 pm				  
				 philowl philowl: "Canada and the U.S. have signed an agreement that paves the way for the militaries from either nation to send troops across each other's borders during an emergency, but some are questioning why the Harper government has kept silent on the deal."Harper is finishing Mulroney's job of selling out Canada to the U.S. Can anyone recall the "by invitation only: Alberta meeting with Vice-president Dick Cheney with Mike Harris, Raloh Klein, Day, Harper, and the other neo cons?  Now the u.s. military has the legal right to take military possession of Canada in an emergency, such as "protection" of Canada's oil reserves.  The largest single consumer of oil in the world is the Pentagon.  Remember, Mulroney introduced Harper as the candidate for the Conservative leadership.  Harper lost, but during the following week Mckay mysteriously changed his mind and switched his support to Harper.  Harper was not publicly elected; he got the leadership by some backroom deal.  One of his first actions was to sign a little publicized deal with the Pentagon.  Wake up, Canada! Before it's too late.
 it's that old secret agenda    lookout we're doomed
 you and Kenmore should get a room.   |  
		
		| 
			
			
			
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:23 pm				  
				 The foilers are getting paranoid....again.   |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  11108
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:40 pm				  
				 ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: As I recall it was Grand Forks that burned, not Winnipeg. ? |  
		
		| 
			
			
				  
					 Posts:  11362
					 
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:27 pm				  
				 uwish uwish: There are currently 3500 CF troop in Texas training for desert missions such as Afgan.
 R U upset about that? GUESS WHAT THEY ARE UNDER CANADIAN COMMAND ALSO! the horror!
 
 grow up!
 Totally different situation. NATO troops train in Canada quite regularly already. |  
		
		| 
			
			
			
				
					 Posted:  Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:31 pm				  
				 Last edited by ziggy on Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.sandorski sandorski: uwish uwish: There are currently 3500 CF troop in Texas training for desert missions such as Afgan.
 R U upset about that? GUESS WHAT THEY ARE UNDER CANADIAN COMMAND ALSO! the horror!
 
 grow up!
 Totally different situation. NATO troops train in Canada quite regularly already.American troops train with Canada,s SOVOPS quite regularly.
 Nato doesnt. |  
	
		|     | Page 2 of 5 
 | [ 66 posts ] |  
	
		| Who is online |  
		| Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests |    |  |