N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
No. It's an assumption based on facts.
And what you're doing now is a desperate attempt to divert from the obvious with an insignificant technicality.
And I know you think that's clever, but {here are these puppies to divert attention from my significantly flawed argument which would have been obvious if I hadn't made gigantic assumptions a page ago and just read the argument slowly}
It's cute, but too much of it gets on the nerves.
FTFY.
You can now post some other irrelevant YouTube monologue to prove to yourself that you 'won' this argument. If, somehow, you manage to post anything relevant, I might chime back in.
