[Public_Domain]

[raydan]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Poor Fiddle, we're all regressives now,

So, you guys get your Soros cheques yet? Mine is taking forever

Direct deposit is the best.

[N_Fiddledog]

Oh wait...I think I get it Ray. You still don't understand that this stuff is all coming from a newspaper. As usual you're the expert on it, but you haven't read it.

Here let me help again.

When last we read Obama's community organizer army, OFA "Organizing for Action" was plotting out how they were going to thug the Republicans when they broke and went to meet the constituents of their districts.

The New York Post continues:

$1:

“Express your concern [to the event’s hosts] they are giving a platform to pro-Trump authoritarianism, racism, and corruption,” it says.

The goal is to make Republicans, even from safe districts, second-guess their support for the Trump agenda, and to prime “the ground for the 2018 midterms when Democrats retake power.”

The goal is to make Republicans, even from safe districts, second-guess their support for the Trump agenda.

“Even the safest [Republican] will be deeply alarmed by signs of organized opposition,” the document states, “because these actions create the impression that they’re not connected to their district and not listening to their constituents.”

After the event, protesters are advised to feed video footage to local and national media.

“Unfavorable exchanges caught on video can be devastating” for Republican lawmakers, it says, when “shared through social media and picked up by local and national media.” After protesters gave MSNBC, CNN and the networks footage of their dust-up with Chaffetz, for example, the outlets ran them continuously, forcing Chaffetz to issue statements defending himself.

The manual also advises protesters to flood “Trump-friendly” lawmakers’ Hill offices with angry phone calls and emails demanding the resignation of top White House adviser Steve Bannon.

A script advises callers to complain: “I’m honestly scared that a known racist and anti-Semite will be working just feet from the Oval Office … It is everyone’s business if a man who promoted white supremacy is serving as an adviser to the president.”

The document provides no evidence to support such accusations.

[N_Fiddledog]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Poor Fiddle, we're all regressives now,

Well not you. I'm seeing you more as some sort of Couch Potato, NEET, who likes to think he's with the anarcho-boobs out Live Action Role Playing (LARPing) as pretend revolutionaries, but can't even manage that.

$1:

So, you guys get your Soros cheques yet? Mine is taking forever

Why would Soros want to pay for you to lay on your couch dreaming of being an Anarcho-LARPer someday.

He's got people out there actually doing stuff.

[Tricks]

So... you're butthurt people are protesting against things they find to be repulsive, and are actively telling their representative that they do not like it.

Isn't that what we are supposed to do in democracy?

[Public_Domain]

[Public_Domain]

[N_Fiddledog]

Tricks Tricks:

So... you're butthurt people are protesting against things they find to be repulsive, and are actively telling their representative that they do not like it.

Isn't that what we are supposed to do in democracy?

I think you're only hearing what you want to hear.

Even if organizing hijacking of seating, grabbing mics and general disruption is simple protest you're ignoring the main point. The Organization organizing these attacks on Republican rallies was a creation of the Obama administration. It has morphed, but Obama is promising to remain active as an organizer after his Presidency. The Post claims he still links to OFA on his website.

This makes him culpable. Anything OFA does he's supporting. That's the point.

[Public_Domain]

[N_Fiddledog]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Also, since you haven't dared enter the other thread yet, I'm wondering what Sargon's your take on Milo is lately?

I don't know what thread you're talking about, but if my not being there is bothering you I think I'll keep at it.

I imagine you and yours are celebrating the end of Milo somewhere now that he's been disinvited from CPAC for talking like a Pedo on YouTube. Is that it?

What's to say. Your guys finally got him. Good for them, I guess. It was inevitable, but we learn and we move on. The next Milo will be smarter.

It's interesting though that you guys are always razzing me about recognizing the developing power of the talking heads of YouTube and your victory would not be possible without them. You do know the "Drunken Peasants" are a collection of Liberal YouTubers don't you? That's where it began.

Oh and the Obama regime created what became "Organizing for Action". Try to keep up. I think it was originally his campaign arm.

[Thanos]

So Trump haters are to blame for the fall of Milo because a convention of hard-core social conservatives don't want anything to do with him because of his attachment to pedophilia/pederasty? I think you finally stretched your Stretch Armstrong doll past it's elastic limit with that one.

As Frasier Crane once said to Cliff Claven, what colour is the sky in your world?

[N_Fiddledog]

Thanos Thanos:

So Trump haters are to blame for the fall of Milo because a convention of hard-core social conservatives don't want anything to do with him because of his attachment to pedophilia/pederasty?

Basically yeah. On the Trump haters thing that should be easy to spot, but yes, CPAC can be dicks. They barred Pamela Geller and Robert (not Richard) Spencer one time for speaking negatively of the "Religion of Peace."

Have your guys over on the media of the fringe left never told you the gossip on Grover Norquist? Pity. I'd agree with any nasty thing they might say.

[Thanos]

So tell me, you loyal trooper you. Breitbart was pretty much responsible for the entire Pizzagate nonsense, inventing a false pedophile ring operating out of a restaurant and nearly precipitating a massacre when someone who goes to the same sites you do decided to show up at CometPingPong armed with an AR-15 to do some "citizen investigation". Yet all this time with Milo they've apparently provided a platform to someone who is/was quite happy to endorse genuine pedophilia/pederasty. Just wondering which of these two things, according to your worldview, was worse for Breitbart to do.

Take all the time you need to formulate your response. I'm sure it'll be a real doozy.

[Public_Domain]

[raydan]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

I imagine you and yours are celebrating the end of Milo somewhere now that he's been disinvited from CPAC for talking like a Pedo on YouTube. Is that it?

What's to say. Your guys finally got him. Good for them, I guess. It was inevitable, but we learn and we move on. The next Milo will be smarter.

Smarter??? The way I see it, they get dumber every time.