CountLothian CountLothian:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
I'd be happy to provide such services in the future, should you feel the need to post such bullshit again.
It's very hard to find certain obvious cover ups on the internet.
.
And that may be for a reason. Absence of evidence is not evidence itself.
CountLothian CountLothian:
Very hard to find tree ring radiation fallout data except something that happened in 777 AD.
anyway
http://www.radiocarbon.com/carbon-datin ... carbon.htmThats what I got but it isn't what I want.
Tree rings all over the planet have fallout in them during and after nuclear bomb testing I lived through so....it's in my bones and that ain't no Horse Hockey.
I wasn't disputing that. I enumerated what about your post that I found to be inaccurate.
CountLothian CountLothian:
Very little data came out after Fuckishima but people as far away as Tokyo were told radioactivity was present, for a short period of news and then nothing. i guess just enough info for important people to flee the area.
There was lots and lots of information that came out of Fukishima. You obviously weren't paying attention. And your facts are inaccurate. Very little outside the immediate area received any significant radiation, and more significantly, no one died. Studies even showed that very few people will even suffer minor affects due to radiation exposure, including people working in the plants after the meltdown.
CountLothian CountLothian:
It was a nuclear melt down played down. The entire area is awash in radioactivity and that ain't no Horse Hockey.
Incorrect. The core melted, that's true, but the area is not 'awash' in radioactivity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_ ... r_disasterTo put that 1000ms/h into context, there is a popular Brazilian beach where you will receive 175ms/h of radiation. No exclusion zone!
CountLothian CountLothian:
Oil dispersants
are weird and no data about them is concrete.
And now a bit of forum vernacular I don"t know who you work for or shill for
Back to moi oil spills and cover ups and non accurate data in the United States is the norm, and that ain't horse hockey.
https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=ch ... ted+StatesWho I 'shill' for?

So, because I question your 'facts', I'm a spy for the oil companies?
If you'd care to show some of these inaccuracies or coverups, the would go a long way to showing us you aren't spreading the bullshit around.
CountLothian CountLothian:
I dunno doc but I don't bull shit...i get facts wrong like some and then admit when I'm wrong...
As do I. But this isn't one of those times.
