[Thanos]

It's hard to see which is worse in this case. Someone having their face raped in a Burger King ad. Or feeling like they just got their ass raped by Burger King's "food' when it decides to make a sudden and explosive exit about an hour after someone makes the mistake of eating it.

[Delwin]

[PluggyRug]

Thanos Thanos:

It's hard to see which is worse in this case. Someone having their face raped in a Burger King ad. Or feeling like they just got their ass raped by Burger King's "food' when it decides to make a sudden and explosive exit about an hour after someone makes the mistake of eating it.

[Gunnair]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Is that your issue here, that she dropped the word "rape" on this issue? Someone who uses the words bitch and whore and "scum" to describe a random model is definitely not the first person i'd go to to discuss the struggle of rape victims, that's for fucking sure.

Duh, BK didn't rape her. They used her image without direct consent to make shitloads of money while sexualizing her and their product. Not rape, UNDERSTOOD PSYCHO. What makes that shit okay though? Why is she not allowed to have an issue with that?

What makes her a whore? That she has a few sexual-seeming images? Jesus Christ.

She's not allowed to scream 'Rape' because someone bought the rights to her photo (that she sold for cash) and did something she didn't like with it.

[martin14]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

I am compeltely disgusted with you.

Delwin Delwin:

Spare me the feigned outrage. You are the degenerate

[Gunnair]

martin14 martin14:

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

I am compeltely disgusted with you.

Delwin Delwin:

Spare me the feigned outrage. You are the degenerate

[bootlegga]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

They didn't need her consent as she sold the rights to those pictures to a distributing party. I don't think she's a whore, bitch or anything else like that, and I also don't think Burger King did anything wrong, but she was stupid in surrendering her rights to those pictures.

Live and learn.