CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:52 pm
 


N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Hey, Ontario wanted socialism. They got their socialism. What? They want a thriving economy too. If they can't figure out the real world doesn't work like that they can stop blaming Harper and start asking themselves why they just voted in the wind turbine queen of subsidies. BTW how's that working out for ya Ontario?

Ontario debt rating outlook cut to negative by Moody’s

Nice change up. Not sure how it's relevant to your problem with the CBC and the article.


You mean like how are they connected? Well with Ontario and the CBC other than the fact the socialists of one run the other, they both make me smile, because I don't live in Ontario, and I don't watch the CBC, but then I stop smiling when I realize I'm paying for both.
Of course I'm sure you felt exactly the same when it was the other way around, when Ontario was THE economic engine of Canada and we were doing the paying.

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
How's that connected to the article? Well other than the fact the author is from the CBC and reeks of Ontario socialist, I have a problem taking any of the four things - the author, Socialism, the CBC, or Ontario - seriously.

Basically it goes like the this. The Ontario Wynne-er from the CBC has a problem with her stagnant economy, and is upset that Alberta doesn't have one. [cry] is all I really have to say.

Wow dude, you really read too much into stuff sometimes. I have absolutely no idea what article you were reading.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5233
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 3:27 pm
 


I actually found it to be a very well balanced article.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23092
PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 6:41 am
 


DanSC DanSC:
bootlegga bootlegga:
That shouldn't make a difference really. While European countries have fewer people to cover, they also have fewer people to pay for those services.


Even if Europe didn't have Germany to pay for everything, there's no reason to the think the expense rises linearly with population.


You're right, you should be able to build in economies of scale that smaller economies can't match.

Having said that, the fact that the US can't provide decent health care to 20 million vets (as you noted) while nations in Europe can do it for all of their citizens (there are more French than there are US vets for example), it essentially proves what Maher said - they can get it to work and you can't.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Previous  1  2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.