PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Yeah, you're comparing a province with entire countries!
In relative terms not absolute ones. The rate of medication deaths is very similar between all developed nations health care systems. Even the US's private / public monster.
$1:
In Ontario it's quite possible the numbers are that low considering the doctors in this province have become very reluctant to hand out scripts for heavy duty opioid pain killers like oxys.
I could believe a 50% reduction, maybe.
But to claim that only 10 people died from a drug related issue in Ontario's health care system over 15 months is not credible.
Given that the rate of accidental deaths for Ontario's system is dead center for all the other systems, they must be truly dropping the ball in some other aspect to make up the majority of deaths causes in the other systems.
(the follow numbers are not the actual numbers, just made up to make the point)
Put it like this, in every other system 100 per 100,000 die in care, 60% die from drug related causes. In Ontario 99 die per 100,000 but only 0.01% die from drug related causes.
The number of people killed by the misapplication of drugs in the Ontario system should be in the range of 1 to 2 thousand per year. If that was the reported number it would be just about dead center for the developed world. What is being reported is 100 to 200 times lower.
100 to 200 times lower.
That number isn't believable. This is bullshit detector 101 stuff.
And yet... even with the 200 times better drug use, some other factor[s] almost completely makes up for this world leading drug system and kill enough people to raise the number of dead back to the world average.
So which is it? A system that's 200 times better than everyone else in one aspect, yet fails at some other aspect to almost perfectly 'fill up' the numbers to fit the average, or something about the methodology used to report the numbers is wrong?