Zipperfish Zipperfish:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
You would be wrong, that it's not a natural response. Listen to the link - it's a radio interview with that same researcher. Very enlightening.
And why would an independent opinion from a U of A Biologist hurt the Oilpatches credibility?
I listened to it. I didn't find her argument all that convincing. I don't know the full story, but it sounds as if the birds were still alive after the storm, and had to put down due to oiling. If that's not the case, I stand corrected. If it is the case, then I maintain that death by oiling in a man-made toxic lake is not natural.
In that, you are correct. It was man made and not natural, but there are many measures in place to prevent wildlife from getting near the ponds. But she does have the full story, we don't. The commission hired her to find out if there was anything that could have been done, or can be done in the future to prevent these wildlife deaths.
The oil is extrememly toxic if injested, and sometimes the wildlife that injests it is beyond hope when found. I worked with the Edmonton Wildlife Rehabilitation Society when that Bunker Oil spilled into Lake Wabamun. It's sad, but it's life.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
To answer your second question--that expert opinion informed the prosecutor's office, as I understand it. It sounds to me as if the detahs of a few hundred birds on the tailings is "a cost of doing business." That will be a hard sell, I think. It is to me, anyway.
Wildlife died from the toxins in those waters long before we came along. We just concentrated it for them. The oilsnads industry also spends a lot of money on things like floating cannons on the ponds to scare wildlife off. As the researcher concluded - birds follow rivers on their migratory route. They will land on the river by default, and anything near the river in an emergency. Having lit tailings ponds near the river is what contributed to the deaths. Since it's Alberta law that tailings ponds are to be recovered, hopefully this won't happen in the future.