Mad_Bomber Mad_Bomber:
I have never said they were interchangeable, just that one does not have more value than the other. A video store clerk’s job is less dangerous, that is why he is making $10.50 an hour. A soldier’s job is more dangerous overseas which is why he gets, Danger Pay, HLTA, Pre Deployment Leave, Post Deployment Leave and decompression in a 5 star resort in Cyprus for a week. If you are arguing that a soldier has more worth than a civilian then you must also argue that a RMS Clerk has less value then an Infanteer, or that someone from JTF2 has more worth than the same Infanteer.

But there is value. For example, the President of the United States has basically a small army defending him (The Secret Service) on top of normal police and military units. The fact is, those Secret Service agents have devoted their lives to defend the President due to his value.
Even on smaller levels, police officers are there to serve and protect the community from dangerous threats, even if it means putting their lives on the line.
Parents will commonly put their own lives in danger for their children. So on and so forth.
The examples can go on and on for a long time. But individuals as well as society do create a pecking order of value. Soldiers might be more important than a store clerk because of the choice the soldier made, and the fact that the soldier made a willing choice to risk his life for that store clerk, and as such, we (supposedly) reward soldiers better in society than store clerks.
On a personal level, parents protect their children, brothers protect their sisters.
This isn't an equal society, some people, on both a personal and a societal level, will be considered more important.