[OnTheIce]

Lemmy Lemmy:

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

I'm repeating the comments from a lawyer.

No, you're misinterpreting those comments.

OTI OTI:

You're disputing those comments.

Nope, just your misunderstanding of them.

Just tap out.

You don't understand the comments that clearly many of us dummies here at CKA can.

I get it Lemmy, you'll never admit you're wrong. I've seen it in you since the first day I arrived here at CKA when you tried to tell a bunch of people they were stupid with respect to welding a gas tank.

You're the same know-it-all that dodges and weaves when he's wrong but will never, ever, admit to being wrong.

[BRAH]

Elizabeth May says Mulcair's reaction was "disturbing" and she was "shaken by that more than anything else"

https://twitter.com/DAJHetherington/status/733476853252399105
____________


Elizabeth May is right about Angry Tom's reaction.

[DrCaleb]

Can we end this now, or do you two need a room? You are both right, according to a third party.

$1:

But the act of taking Brown by the arm and ushering him to his seat, "in the most technical sense … probably meets all the requirements for assault," said Toronto lawyer Daniel Lerner, who was a former Ontario Crown prosecutor.

"The basic definition of an assault is if a person intentionally uses force on another person without their consent."

(Brown said he told the prime minister to let go of him.)

But that definition is broad and "can capture quite a lot," Lerner said.

If incidents similar to that which occurred in the House of Commons were the standard by which people were charged, thousands of daily encounters involving physical contact could wind up in court. For example, someone pushing their way through a crowded bus or elbowing their way through a crowd at a baseball game could also, technically, be guilty of assault.

"That's not the type of behaviour meant to be captured by criminal law," Lerner said. "If it's just to grab a person's arm without really much in the way of force behind it, then it would never really capture the criminal justice system's attention."

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin- ... -1.3590357

[2Cdo]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Lemmy Lemmy:

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

I'm repeating the comments from a lawyer.

No, you're misinterpreting those comments.

OTI OTI:

You're disputing those comments.

Nope, just your misunderstanding of them.

Just tap out.

You don't understand the comments that clearly many of us dummies here at CKA can.

I get it Lemmy, you'll never admit you're wrong. I've seen it in you since the first day I arrived here at CKA when you tried to tell a bunch of people they were stupid with respect to welding a gas tank.

You're the same know-it-all that dodges and weaves when he's wrong but will never, ever, admit to being wrong.

An economics professor, lawyer and a fully qualified welder.

[ShepherdsDog]

Parliament has broken the rule....

[Thanos]

Pretty sure they broke that rule on opening day back in 1867.

[ShepherdsDog]

$1:

But perhaps the most appalling element of the events? New Democrat MPs have characterized so-called elbowgate as gender-based violence.

NDP MP Niki Ashton said that “it is very important that young women in this space feel safe to come here and work here.” NDP MP Brigitte Sansoucy went so far as to make a comparison to “abusive husbands” whose wives had taken shelter at a centre for battered women.

To manipulate the cause of violence against women for partisan purposes is the antithesis of NDP values of equality.

To compare this incident to violence against women is a slap in the face to any woman who has actually been assaulted.

To label this as violence against women is just plain cruel: Any woman who has suffered real violence certainly knows an accidental elbow is not akin to violence.

This comparison – and all statements likening this incident to gendered violence – diminish the cause of those who fight violence against women. It diminishes the pain of the very real trauma experienced by women who have suffered abuse at the hands of men.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/ ... e30101483/

yup.... full on turbocharged retard

[Thanos]

Dipper involvement in anything usually means at least 80 to 90% more trigglypuffing for stunt value than is required. Or desired.

[PluggyRug]

Lots of NDP stormy teacups. One needs to ask, where are the cucumber sandwiches?

[Strutz]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

$1:

But perhaps the most appalling element of the events? New Democrat MPs have characterized so-called elbowgate as gender-based violence.

NDP MP Niki Ashton said that “it is very important that young women in this space feel safe to come here and work here.” NDP MP Brigitte Sansoucy went so far as to make a comparison to “abusive husbands” whose wives had taken shelter at a centre for battered women.

To manipulate the cause of violence against women for partisan purposes is the antithesis of NDP values of equality.

To compare this incident to violence against women is a slap in the face to any woman who has actually been assaulted.

To label this as violence against women is just plain cruel: Any woman who has suffered real violence certainly knows an accidental elbow is not akin to violence.

This comparison – and all statements likening this incident to gendered violence – diminish the cause of those who fight violence against women. It diminishes the pain of the very real trauma experienced by women who have suffered abuse at the hands of men.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/ ... e30101483/

yup.... full on turbocharged retard

Completely ridiculous statements.

While the entire incident was unnecessary by everyone involved the reaction to it has been just as bad. So much media hype you'd think there was an all-out bench clearing brawl that took place.

What's done is done. No one got hurt. Everyone get over it. Move on. Get back to doing what you were all elected to do.

[BartSimpson]

NDP sniping at Liberals.

To me it's like Sunni terrorists sniping at Shiite terrorists.

[herbie]

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

Lots of NDP stormy teacups. One needs to ask, where are the cucumber sandwiches?

They heard somebody somewhere was allergic to cucumbers, so they're not allowed.

[ShepherdsDog]

I've got friends in Taiwan asking me what happened, so I showed them the video, and they still ask what happened.

[BRAH]

[Strutz]

BRAH BRAH:

:lol:

How about some boob protectors?