[Unsound]

I wasn't planning on including pictures.

More just a general sentiment is what I'm looking for, I suppose. Don't actually care all that much.

And for the record, I don't think I've ever in my life flaunted my dick.

[Zipperfish]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

It's medically unnecessary and painful, so I don't support it.

Which is perfectly fine. However, you don't have to run around calling it something its not to make your point.

It wasn't makingh my point. I posted my "point" a dozen times already. The fact that you're arguing semantics indicates you don't have much of a point.

[OnTheIce]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

It wasn't makingh my point. I posted my "point" a dozen times already. The fact that you're arguing semantics indicates you don't have much of a point.

Zip, quit the bullshit. How can you call me obtuse when you dance around the words you actually said?

Yes, you made your point but in doing so, you labelled circumcision something that it's not. It's calling an apple an orange.

You've made your point that you don't see any need for such a procedure and I've made my point on the opposite end.

The difference being, I didn't throw in words to sensationalise my point.

[Thanos]

Unsound Unsound:

I think we should just let the ladies, and the gay dudes, vote on it and then call it sttled.

Glad I've got all these rep points to comfort me because in this other contest I'll be coming in last. Goddamn, I wish I was black below the beltline.

[Zipperfish]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Yes, you made your point but in doing so, you labelled circumcision something that it's not. It's calling an apple an orange.

According to you. I disagree, with, in my opinion, good evidence. We're not going to settle the issue arguing over the definition of mutilation. In my opinion it's mutilation; in your opinion, it's not. Whether it's mutilation or not does not change my thoughts on the issue.

$1:

You've made your point that you don't see any need for such a procedure and I've made my point on the opposite end.

I don't think you've ever made a point that the procedure is "needed" (your words). Mostly you've just indicated a preference for it.

[Gunnair]

raydan raydan:

raydan raydan:

It's been a while since we've had the "cut/uncut" discussion.
I wonder if we'll all agree on which one is best this time.

I called it... page 1.

Oh.....okay. Next you'll call a global warming discussion, existence of God discussion, wealth equity discussion, Shep is a not-so-closet sheep shager discussion, all cops are bad discussion, did Thanos really get that Brazilian wax discussion, should Quebec stay in Canada discussion, etc.

Next you'll call the sun hot and rain wet.

[ShepherdsDog]

$1:

Oh.....okay. Next you'll call a global warming discussion, existence of God discussion, wealth equity discussion, Shep is a not-so-closet sheep shager discussion, all cops are bad discussion, did Thanos really get that Brazilian wax discussion, should Quebec stay in Canada discussion, etc.

as opposed to yourself....who is very open about the entire matter. And what the fuck is a shager you semi literate, knuckle-dragging, luster after lambs?

[raydan]

Gunnair Gunnair:

raydan raydan:

raydan raydan:

It's been a while since we've had the "cut/uncut" discussion.
I wonder if we'll all agree on which one is best this time.

I called it... page 1.

Oh.....okay. Next you'll call a global warming discussion, existence of God discussion, wealth equity discussion, Shep is a not-so-closet sheep shager discussion, all cops are bad discussion, did Thanos really get that Brazilian wax discussion, should Quebec stay in Canada discussion, etc.

Next you'll call the sun hot and rain wet.

I thought you were working on your character flaws, you cranky old geezer!

[Unsound]

raydan raydan:

I thought you were working on your character flaws, you cranky old geezer!

He must've realized that it's just his character...wouldn't be anything left without the flaws.

[2Cdo]

Holy shit, ten pages on the pros and cons of "hoods" or "helmets"!

[andyt]

It's a sensitive topic that's hard to get a grip on.

[CanadianJeff]

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Well, as the foreskin doesn't grow back, that's pretty much irreparable damage. Thanks for proving my point.

Circumcision is legal for the same reason alcohol is. Snuck in under the grandfather clause.

Damage? Besides the fact the penis looks 100x better and is cleaner without that shit hanging off the end, I'd say it's "damage" well done.

And comparing alcohol use to so-called child abuse? Impressive.

So you're claiming the government is turning a blind eye to what you consider child abuse?

Ok what I see is originally Ice tried to support cock chopping by saying it was medically supported as a measure of prevention. I like to think I thoroughly busted that a few pages back and I thought the discussion was over.

Now you still push for it but under the ascetics banner? Are you even aware that before that banner was in place the practice used to be touted as a way of reducing kids from masturbating?

Face it it's purely based out of tradition and has no place in the modern world. We should be well beyond chopping off pieces of our bodies for simple looks at this point.

[Tricks]

DanSC DanSC:

saturn_656 saturn_656:

mu·ti·late (mytl-t)
tr.v. mu·ti·lat·ed, mu·ti·lat·ing, mu·ti·lates
1. To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue. See Synonyms at batter1.
3. To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.

Maybe you've been told it's imperfect, but I've only received rave reviews about my circumcised penis

I'm glad I'm circumcised. It's very low maintenance and if that area was any <i>more</i> sensitive, I probably wouldn't be able to function in society.

All of this is irrelevant to the topic of circumcising male newborns, but let's not turn this into a literal pissing match between sheathed and unsheathed bell-ends.

I laughed at every sentence in this post. Well played.

[Tricks]

This thread has reaffirmed my not wanting children. I want no part of a decision like this.

[OnTheIce]

CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:

Ice tried to support cock chopping by saying it was medically supported as a measure of prevention. I like to think I thoroughly busted that a few pages back and I thought the discussion was over.

You can think whatever you want if you intend to dismiss facts from all sides. I don't dismiss the fact that organizations all over the World don't think it's medically necessary but on the flip side, I don't ignore the benefits of such a procedure.

CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:

Now you still push for it but under the ascetics banner? Are you even aware that before that banner was in place the practice used to be touted as a way of reducing kids from masturbating?

I don't give a shit what the practice used to be about and amazingly enough, a procedure can have multiple benefits, as it does in this case.

CanadianJeff CanadianJeff:

Face it it's purely based out of tradition and has no place in the modern world. We should be well beyond chopping off pieces of our bodies for simple looks at this point.

Perhaps in your World, it doesn't have a place. But in my World and the World of millions of parents in Canada and the US, it does have it's place.