CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:51 am
 


Title: What exactly does 'one' mean' Court of Appeal passes judgement on thorny mathematical issue
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2015-06-28 00:31:25


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:51 am
 


Should have put Bill Clinton on the job.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:43 am
 


The judges got it wrong. There's a crap load of difference between having 1 of something and 1% of something. I have one car. If I had 1% of a car I'd only have a lug nut, maybe two.
If I'm using 0.5% saline solution for something, it is NOT the same as 1% saline solution.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:46 am
 


Since they went with 2% for the upper limit, apply the same error factor to the lower limit. ie from .8 to 25.5


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:21 pm
 


andyt andyt:
Since they went with 2% for the upper limit, apply the same error factor to the lower limit. ie from .8 to 25.5

No need. One is one. Any percentage of one is a different number than one.
However, the angle at which they went at the argument to rule on it was wrong as well. While they were arguing what the value of one really was, the case was centered around isotonic solutions in the percentile range. Therefore, as I said previously, 1% of something does not equal one. Unless it's 1% of 100.

Their argument of how rounding up numbers is the standard is also faulty. We only round off numbers when the system they are plugged into doesn't allow fractions, like our monetary system which doesn't have half cents. Secondly, their claim that the value of 1 can range from 0.5 to 1.5 doesn't work under their rounding up scheme as 1.5 would become 2. At which point 1 would then have to equal 2.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:51 pm
 


That doesn't work either. At what point is 0.999999999999999....% =/ to 1? How precisely can the concentration be measured?


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
Profile
Posts: 24
PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:25 am
 


I think they got it wrong. "1" is defined in mathematical terms as an integer, it is exactly "1" no more no less. To write a number as 1.0000...N or .9999...N would imply that the number is not to be inferred as exactly 1 or an integer. rounding off .5 to 1.5 as one is not a valid argument.You cannot have .5 or 1.5 of a car.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.