CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 8:52 pm
 


Title: Tories sticking with troubled military helicopters to replace ancient Sea Kings
Category: Military
Posted By: wildrosegirl
Date: 2014-01-03 15:13:42
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13404
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 8:52 pm
 


It looks like they are going to retire the Sea Kings before replacements ready to go. I suppose, since more and more of the Navy is going to be tied up by the accountants, it won't matter if those ships have any capability or not anyway. How typically, cynically Canadian this all is.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10503
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:45 am
 


Jesus, the quagmire that is the Canadian Forces continues. What a disservice to those who wear the uniform. The cyclone was supposed to be in service years ago... Time to look at an 'off the shelf' option.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:28 am
 


In ancient Rome, when someone failed as completely as Sikorsky has, they would fall on their swords.

Where's your frackin' sword Sikorsky?!?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:36 am
 


And here I was hoping that the Conservatives would actually cancel this program - guess they are too scared to give the other party's ammunition about cancellation penalties (Lord knows they love using that on the Liberals).

This chopper is DOA and we should be looking at alternatives, not still throwing good money after bad on the Cyclone.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 11:06 am
 


One thing I will never understand about procurement - If you're procuring to replace equipment in a role that it performed admirably in, and that role has not changed, why do you need a whole new vehicle? I'm not suggesting refurbishment, but building a new vehicle based off the old design and specs.

Example - Why couldn't they take the MLVW design, update the cab, gauges, lighting, rear seating, radio setup, etc, throw a cummins in it, and call it a done deal? Currently 2 different trucks trying to fill that role and neither does a very good job where I've seen them used/used them myself.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.