CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:58 am
 


Title: Stealth F-35 Lightning II will change the way Canada fights in the air
Category: Military
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2010-07-20 21:19:39
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:58 am
 


Good. They can beat the shit of anybody who threatens them with superior fire power and death from above.

You won't win against the Chinese by talking.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2218
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:40 pm
 


GreenTiger GreenTiger:
Good. They can beat the shit of anybody who threatens them with superior fire power and death from above.

You won't win against the Chinese by talking.


Fear Card

Some people with limited vision seem to think that you have to go to war to 'win' and that negotiations over the arctic have to be some crazy-ass cold-war Zero-Sum game.

In reality once you start fighting you've already lost, one would think that the right would have learned that from trying to bring 'freedom' to Iraq and Afghanisan.

And at 245,000,000 tax-payer dollars per copy in reality if we go ahead with this, we've already. lost


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:04 pm
 


HyperionTheEvil HyperionTheEvil:
Some people with limited vision seem to think that you have to go to war to 'win' and that negotiations over the arctic have to be some crazy-ass cold-war Zero-Sum game.


So what portion of Canada's arctic should be given to China?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:31 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
HyperionTheEvil HyperionTheEvil:
Some people with limited vision seem to think that you have to go to war to 'win' and that negotiations over the arctic have to be some crazy-ass cold-war Zero-Sum game.


So what portion of Canada's arctic should be given to China?

By HyperionThe Evil's position China can take whatever it wants as the Canadians wouldn't want to offend the Chinese by exerting sovereignty over their territory. The Chinese are perfectly willing to play the game of give and take: Canada will give and the Chinese will take. The UN would be happy.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7835
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:12 pm
 


HyperionTheEvil HyperionTheEvil:
Some people with limited vision seem to think that you have to go to war to 'win' and that negotiations over the arctic have to be some crazy-ass cold-war Zero-Sum game.


What's there to negotiate, exactly? The Canadian Arctic is Canadian. The American portion is American, the Russian portion is Russian. It's not Chinese, or Indian, or Australian, or Egyptian, or anybody else.

Negotiating away Canadian sovereignty is silly.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:26 pm
 


commanderkai commanderkai:
Negotiating away Canadian sovereignty is silly.


Yet that's precisely what Hyptard is proposing. :roll:


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 3598
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:39 pm
 


I cannot understand anyone thinking these jets are a bad purchase. When do we need to replace our aging F-18s, when they start dropping out of the sky and killing pilots or when they are scambled and cannot meet the threat due to being outdated and old.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:00 pm
 


Air superiority fighters are, without question, needed by the CF. But what galls me is the insistence of the defense industries that the only fighters they'll make have to be these massively expensive fighters. I also don't care for the insistence of command that they have to have these platforms exclusively. If there's a war, there's no substitute for these fighters. But for patrolling the Arctic and for showing the flag you need something that has range and endurance and that can hang some deadly hardware off the wings. You just don't need to spend $200m for that.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.