saturn_656 saturn_656:
Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
Nope. What would ISAF have done?
Or what would ISAF have been forced to do? Fire on civilians protesting, probably armed with rocks, small arms and a few machetes.
You call it a protest, I'd term it an armed assault.
That's a very fine line, regardless ISAF is not in place to police the populace. Unless it is upon request of the host nation.
I dont
think ISAF is in the wrong here. If 2000 civilians were converging on an area that does not have military value to ISAF, it is not up to the commander of the local FOB to roll out and break it up.
If the local town down the way swarms a warlord's vehicle, burning the vehicle and the family inside it to the ground. Is it ISAF's fault for not saving them?
If the UN does not have the ability to defend it's own compounds from attack, they should not be there.