[Newsbot]

Title: Obama vetoes 9/11 bill; possible override by Congress looms
Category: Uncle Sam
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2016-09-24 00:59:55

[llama66]

This should end well. It's not like there's a long list of countries that would love for nothing more than to drag the united States through the mud via law suit. Oh, and to the people who sue, should Congress overide the Veto, good luck collecting.

[Freakinoldguy]

$1:

I have deep sympathy for the families of the victims of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Obama wrote to the Senate in a veto message about the bill, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. But, he said, "the JASTA would be detrimental to U.S. national interests more broadly.

Bullshit. This is Obama speak for, The Saudi's want the Democratic Party as the next Gov't and allowing them to be sued would likely put a damper on their fervour and amount of money they're contributing to get that bitch Hillary elected.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/01/heres-wh ... alyst.html

As for collecting. It would be alot easier than you think. The Saudi's have billions tied up in America's banks so any suit they lost would come out of that amount.

But here's the real reason Obama is sweating bullets about what should be a non issue. The 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act protects all foreign governments from lawsuits with one major exception. State Sanctioned assassinations an act which, is what the Saudi's were complicit in.

http://articles.philly.com/2008-06-02/n ... nities-act

So, the Democrats stand to lose not only one of Hillary's biggest sponsors if this bill passes but also their reputation because as everyone knows, once a Gov't or former lover gets spurned they tend to start telling tales out of class. Something the Dem's and especially the Clintons don't want to happen.

[llama66]

It's going to be a can of worms. Not that I care, it'll be the beginning of another spat. Probably start another major conflict in the middle East.

We allege the Saudis were involved, I dunno if they were, however I'm sure nations like Pakistan can then sue the States for the deaths of the innocent (children) in the drone strikes, other nation could also sue for thier civilian losses in this drone war. I'm concerned that if the Americans push forward, there will be consequences.

Hell it could allow Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, Syria, or <insert american bombed nation here> to allege the invasions or bombing of those nations were assassinations of thier civilians.

I'm playing devil's advocate,so please understand.

[Freakinoldguy]

llama66 llama66:

It's going to be a can of worms. Not that I care, it'll be the beginning of another spat. Probably start another major conflict in the middle East.

We allege the Saudis were involved, I dunno if they were, however I'm sure nations like Pakistan can then sue the States for the deaths of the innocent (children) in the drone strikes, other nation could also sue for thier civilian losses in this drone war. I'm concerned that if the Americans push forward, there will be consequences.

Hell it could allow Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, Syria, or <insert american bombed nation here> to allege the invasions or bombing of those nations were assassinations of thier civilians.

I'm playing devil's advocate,so please understand.

I'm pretty sure that since most of these countries don't have anything like the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act they can already sue the US. The difference between these third world crapholes and America is that the US doesn't have billions lying around in their banks which would mean even if these clowns won a lawsuit in their home country, collecting it would be a whole different kettle of fish.

[katsung47]

It's just a stage show for 911 victims in New York. There are too many demand for compensation, so government throw the ball to Saudi. But it's against international regulation. So they let Obama to play a black face to veto it.

Next, the Congress will not have enough votes to overrule Obama. That will be the end of it.

[GreenTiger]

The Saudis have put a lot of money into the Clinton Foundation this is where it pays off.

[katsung47]

The question is now Iraqi people can sue US for its invasion, can't they?

[katsung47]

Now it's clear that they create this bill to create a market crash. That's how they make money from people. Though this plot failed to be carried through on 9/30. They reserve it(Saudi dumping US treasury) for next time.

925. US avoided a D-DAY (10/11/2016)

My wife and my daughter had a trip to North Europe from 9/23 to 10/2. I think it was arranged by the feds(FBI and DEA). To my experience, it used to be arranged with murder plot. (Both on me and my relatives) Also if the murder plot had been successful, there would be big events taking place to distract public's attention from a small killing case in California. On 6/11/2001, they used the execution of McVeigh as distraction.

So when on 9/25 there was a warning of D-day (9/30) - two days before my wife's returning, I naturally thought of that could be the distraction of the plot. I wrote about it in #923 on 9/25.

$1:

Friday, September 30th, 2016:

D-DAY
FOR THE U.S DOLLAR
On Friday, September 30th...
a new kind of "world money" goes live.

The D-DAY big financial collapse didn't happen because the Feds failed to murder me at that time. I still would say my perspective is very correct.

Two news prove it.

1.

$1:

Financial Hell might break loose tomorrow. Congress OVER-RIDES Obama Veto of Saudi Arabia Lawsuit Bill! Saudis may retaliate by pulling Billions out of Markets and Billions more out of Banks.

Post by Newsroom - Sep 28, 2016

Saudi Arabia made clear that if this Bill was passed, it would withdraw what they claimed would be seven-hundred and fifty BILLION dollars of assets that the Kingdom has in the United States, so as to protect those assets from being seized under the lawsuit provisions.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/business/2126

2.

$1:

U.S. Congress passes funding bill; averts government shutdown

Reuters September 28, 2016


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Congress on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved and sent to President Barack Obama legislation preventing government shutdowns at the end of this week by temporarily funding federal agencies through Dec. 9.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-congress-p ... iness.html

Watch the date of these two news. If the Congress had't passed the funding bill and Saudi dumped US treasury. Then the D-DAY would have become true.

[katsung47]

Though nothing happens, they still reserve the method - Saudi can anytime to dump US treasury. Beware of a market crash.

[llama66]

Dude. Take your meds.

[andyt]

Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:

$1:

I have deep sympathy for the families of the victims of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Obama wrote to the Senate in a veto message about the bill, the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act. But, he said, "the JASTA would be detrimental to U.S. national interests more broadly.

Bullshit. This is Obama speak for, The Saudi's want the Democratic Party as the next Gov't and allowing them to be sued would likely put a damper on their fervour and amount of money they're contributing to get that bitch Hillary elected.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/01/heres-wh ... alyst.html

As for collecting. It would be alot easier than you think. The Saudi's have billions tied up in America's banks so any suit they lost would come out of that amount.

But here's the real reason Obama is sweating bullets about what should be a non issue. The 1976 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act protects all foreign governments from lawsuits with one major exception. State Sanctioned assassinations an act which, is what the Saudi's were complicit in.

http://articles.philly.com/2008-06-02/n ... nities-act

So, the Democrats stand to lose not only one of Hillary's biggest sponsors if this bill passes but also their reputation because as everyone knows, once a Gov't or former lover gets spurned they tend to start telling tales out of class. Something the Dem's and especially the Clintons don't want to happen.

Come on, you're smarter than this.

You think this guy,
who allowed the Saudis to be the only ones allowed to fly after 911, would have acted any differently? Every president in recent times has sucked up to the Saudis. It's got nothing to do with Hilary, it's foreign relations, something a Republican congress isn't concerned about with a Democratic president. For some unfathomable reason, the Saudis seem to have presidents of either party by the nuts.

[katsung47]

The question is why haven't they passed the 9/11 victim Bill 14 years ago, but suddenly wake up for a past story.

[Thanos]

[katsung47]

Here is #923 I wrote on 9/25 when I saw 9/30 D-DAY warning.


923. Killing plot goes on (9/25/2016)

My wife and my daughter are having a trip in North European from 9/23 to 10/2. I think it was arranged by the Feds.(FBI and DEA) It's easy for them to create accident in a trip.

The roofing contract was finished on Aug. 2nd. The ground vibration feeling was hardly felt or weakened for a little while but recovered strongly recently. I allege the Feds is still going to create a roof falling death - at the time when my wife is absent.

Then who will be that victim falling from the roof? The Westshore company said within one month after the work finished, a city inspector will come to examine the job. That inspector would be a sacrifice, I think. This is how the Feds to frame their target in a death incident.

Something big will happen from 9/23 to 10/2. In internet, there's a pop-up warning:

Friday, September 30th, 2016:

D-DAY
FOR THE U.S DOLLAR
On Friday, September 30th...
a new kind of "world money" goes live.