$1:
Canada’s first-ever Minister of Middle Class Prosperity declined to provide a clear definition of the middle class, but she said having kids enrolled in hockey is a telltale sign.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politic ... ide-clear/This one must have gone to the Jean Chretien Liberal Party School of unintelligible double speak.
$1:
I define the middle class [as] where people feel that they can afford their way of life, she told CBC Radio The Current. They have a quality of life, and they can have, you know, send their kids to play hockey or even have different activities. It's having the cost of living where you can do what you want with your families.
I thought it sounded alot like this explanation of proof by Jean Chretien.
$1:
A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.
Either way it's not a good sign when your minister of the middle class can't explain what the middle class really is. But then again the Liberal party has been avoiding what the middle class really is since they got reelected in 15.
CKA Elite 
